New Battle on Vieques

New Battle on Vieques, Over Navy’s Cleanup of Munitions

By MIREYA NAVARRO
Published: August 6, 2009

VIEQUES, P.R. – The United States Navy ceased military training operations on this small island in 2003, and windows no longer rattle from the shelling from ships and air-to-ground bombings.

Gone are the protests that drew celebrities like Benicio Del Toro and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Real estate prices and tourism have boomed: a 157-room Starwood W hotel is expected to open by December on the island, which is seven miles east of Puerto Rico’s mainland.

But Vieques, once the largest training area for the United States Atlantic Fleet Forces, is still largely defined by its old struggles. Once again, residents have squared off against the American military.

The Navy has begun removing hazardous unexploded munitions from its old training ground by detonating them in the open air. It also proposes to burn through nearly 100 acres of dense tropical vegetation to locate and explode highly sensitive cluster bombs.

But what could have been a healing process has been marred by lingering mistrust. As the Navy moves to erase a bitter vestige of its long presence here, residents assert that it is simply exposing them again to risk.

“The great majority of emergency room visits here last year were for respiratory problems,” said Evelyn Delerme Camacho, the mayor of Vieques. “Can they guarantee that contaminants or smoke won’t reach the population? Would we have to wait and see if there’s a problem?”

The cleanup comes as the local Vieques government and most of the island’s 9,300 residents pursue claims against the United States government for contamination and for illnesses that they assert are linked to pollutants released during decades of live-fire and bombing exercises beginning in World War II.

Given the history of grievances, many locals are aghast that the Navy’s methods involve burnings and detonations whose booms can be heard in some residential areas, setting people on edge. They have spoken out at public hearings and in legislative resolutions.

But Christopher T. Penny, head of the Navy’s Vieques restoration program, said the unexploded bombs are too powerful to be set off in detonation chambers. And he said that experiments to cut through the dense vegetation with a remote-control device had not had much success.

Environmental Protection Agency officials who are overseeing the project say that such on-site detonations are typical of cleanups at former military training ranges. Jose C. Font, an E.P.A. deputy director in San Juan, says they pose no threat to human health as long as limited amounts are exploded each time, the wind is calm and air quality is monitored constantly.

In 2005 the training ground was designated a federal Superfund site, giving the E.P.A. the authority to order a cleanup led by the party responsible for the pollution.

The unexploded munitions lie on 8,900 acres of former Navy land on the eastern end of the island, including 1,100 acres of what was once the live impact area. The E.P.A. says the cleanup could take 10 years or more.

Workers are using historical records, aerial photography and high-power metal detectors to locate the munitions before cutting through the foliage and detonating them. So far, the Navy says, it has identified 18,700 munitions and explosives and blown up about a third of those.

The E.P.A. says that the hazardous substances associated with ordnance that may be present in Vieques include TNT, napalm, depleted uranium, mercury, lead and other chemicals, including PCBs.

Residents’ concerns about the cleanup are heightened by suspicions of a link between the contaminants and what Puerto Rico’s health department found were disproportionately high rates of illnesses like cancer, hypertension and liver disease on the island.

In 2003, the federal Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, which assesses health hazards at Superfund sites, concluded that levels of heavy metals and explosive compounds found in Vieques’s soil, groundwater, air and fish did not pose a health risk.

But this year the registry agency said it would “rigorously” revisit its 2003 finding, and its director, Dr. Howard Frumkin, plans to visit Vieques on Wednesday to meet with residents.

Puerto Rico’s legislature, meanwhile, has asked President Obama to keep a campaign promise to “achieve an environmentally acceptable cleanup” and “closely monitor the health of the people of Vieques and promote appropriate remedies.”

Most contested here is a Navy request to the E.P.A. and the Environmental Quality Board in Puerto Rico to allow the controlled burn to clear vegetation and find bombs. The risk of accidental explosions, the Navy says, is too high for workers to do it by hand using chainsaws, machetes and trimmers.

“The issue is safety,” said Mr. Penny of the Navy. Many residents complain that they have not received enough information to feel reassured. Among them are a group that gathers on most evenings in a plaza of sand-colored buildings anchored by the church in Isabel Segunda, Vieques’s main town.

“We hear they are taking out bombs, but we haven’t been informed of what exactly is coming out of there and whether there’s more contamination when they get it out,” said Julio Serrano, 57, who works at the airport as an operations supervisor. “We need to be told clearly what’s in there.”

Yet some experts on military cleanups suggest that, rather than focusing on any short-term air quality problems, residents might consider the possibility of an accidental explosion that is years away.

“The real risk is that there’s no technology available that would guarantee that they’ve removed every piece of ordnance,” said Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson, an assistant professor of environmental sciences and engineering at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill who has studied the risks of adapting former training ranges. “There’s no way to make that land safe for reuse unless it’s very restrictive.”

Other battles loom. Most of the 26,000 acres the Navy used to own on the eastern and western ends of Vieques – making up about three-fourths of the island – have been turned over to the Department of the Interior, which plans to maintain the land as a wildlife preserve.

The Fish and Wildlife Service has already opened up small portions of the area to the public as a wildlife refuge that includes gorgeous undeveloped beaches where sea turtles like the loggerhead and hawksbill nest.

But Mayor Delerme Camacho said that once the cleanup is over, Vieques’s residents want to be able to use the land for housing and ecotourism, too. Already, those eager to build have staked out makeshift claims with signs on trees within a chunk of 4,000 acres transferred by the Navy to the municipal government.

Though fishermen can now catch red snapper and yellowtail unfettered by the Navy’s target practice, and visitors have discovered the rural charms of a place where horses roam freely on the roads, Vieques still has high rates of poverty and lacks a full-fledged hospital.

Ismael Guadalupe, 65, a retired teacher and leader in the long resistance to the Navy’s operations here, said that while the training is over, the fighting continues. “As one of our sayings goes, ‘If we had to eat the bone, now we should be able to eat the meat,’ ” he said.

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/07/science/earth/07vieques.html

Vieques, La Lucha Continúa: Reflections on 10 Years Since the Death of David Sanes

Vieques, La Lucha Continúa: Reflections on 10 Years Since the Death of David Sanes

Apr 9th, 2009

By Déborah Berman Santana

(Spanish article below)

April 19, 2009, marks ten years since a U.S. Marines pilot missed his target while bombing Vieques, killing civilian guard David Sanes Rodríguez. David was not the first Viequense to die at the hands of the military; however, his death was the “drop that overflowed the cup” of more than sixty years of military occupation of three fourths of Vieques’ land, causing economic stagnation and ecological devastation. David’s death united Puerto Ricans in a show of resistance whose messages reverberated worldwide: Not one more bomb! Navy out! Peace for Vieques! Four intense years of militant, nonviolence civil disobedience, including thousands of arrests, forced the Navy to close its base on May 1, 2003.

Nonetheless, the base closure signaled merely the end of one phase of the Vieques struggle, where “true peace” has been locally defined as “the Four D’s”: Demilitarization, Decontamination, Devolution (return of lands), and (sustainable) Development by and for Viequenses. Six years after the base closed — ten years since David’s death-where is Vieques?

Demilitarization: While bombings and other military maneuvers were halted, the military still operates powerful ROTHR radar and radio towers on Mount Pirata, officially for the “war on drugs”; however, evidence points to use for electronic warfare, including weather modification.

Decontamination: The Navy is responsible for environmental cleanup. Since the land is designated as a “wildlife refuge” required cleanup levels are insufficient, particularly for a population suffering from the health effects of contamination from all kinds of military weapons. Activists are currently fighting the Navy’s plan to simply burn the vegetation in the bombing range, using a variety of strategies – including risking arrest by entering the bombing range and once again serving as human shields to defend Vieques.

Devolution: The ex-base lands are still under U.S. Government control, which not only restricts Viequenses’ use of their island, but also carries the risk of re-militarization. Activists recently met to plan a strategy that would eventually return the lands to the people of Vieques.

Development: Worldwide attention to Vieques also attracted land speculators and other well-heeled outsiders who have caused property values to skyrocket, thus endangering the Viequenses’ ability to afford to stay on their own island. Creation of a Vieques Community Land Trust – one of the few mechanisms in a capitalist market – would help put brakes on land prices and also provide an entity that could receive and administer the returned lands. If Viequenses can manage to recover their beloved island, care for and develop it, and stabilize their community, David Sanes’ death will have not been in vain.

abril del 2009

Vieques, la lucha continúa:
Reflexiones a los diez años de la muerte de David Sanes

Por Déborah Berman Santana

El 19 de abril del 2009, se cumplirán diez años del incidente en que un piloto de la marina norteamericana se desvió de su objetivo durante un bombardeo en Vieques, y ocasionó la muerte del guardia civil David Sanes Rodríguez. David no fue el primer civil en morir a manos del ejército norteamericano; pero su muerte fue la “última gota en colmar la copa” de mas de 60 años de ocupación militar de mas de tres cuartas partes del territorio viequense; ocupación que solo ha traído el estancamiento económico y la devastación ecológica. La muerte de David unió a los puertorriqueños en una manifestación de resistencia, y el mensaje de esta se hizo sentir en todo el mundo. ¡Ni una bomba mas! ¡Fuera la marina! ¡Paz para Vieques! Luego de cuatro años intensos de desobediencia civil militante y pacífica, en los cuales se dieron miles de arrestos, la marina fue obligada a cerrar su base militar el 1 de mayo del 2003.

No obstante, el cierre de la base solo significó el fin de una etapa de la lucha de Vieques, en donde la “paz verdadera” que buscan los viequenses ha sido definida como las cuatro D’s”. Estas son: la desmilitarización, descontaminación, y la devolución, (el regreso de las tierras, así como su desarrollo sostenible bajo la dirección y para el beneficio de los viequenses.) A seis años del cierre de la base y diez años de la muerte de David Sanes, ¿cual es la situación de Vieques?

Desmilitarización: Aunque los bombardeos y otros ejercicios militares han sido frenados, el ejército aún mantiene poderosos radares ROTHR y torres radiales en el Monte Pirata. Estos según la versión oficial del ejército forman parte de la “guerra contra las drogas”; sin embargo, la evidencia sugiere que el equipo está siendo utilizado en ejercicios de la guerra electrónica, los cuales incluyen modificaciones climatológicas.

Descontaminación: La marina es responsable de la limpieza del ambiente de Vieques. Como el territorio fue designado como refugio para la vida silvestre,” los niveles de limpieza que estos lugares exigen son insuficientes, especialmente para una población cuya salud sufre los efectos de la contaminación mediante el uso de toda clase de armamentos militares. En estos momentos los activistas están tratando de impedir que la marina queme la vegetación en los campos de prácticas de bombardeo. Para ello se están valiendo de una diversidad de estrategias – que incluyen enfrentar los arrestos y entrar a esos campos para convertirse una vez mas en escudos humanos para proteger a Vieques.

Devolución: Las tierras que antes componían la base militar aún están bajo el control del gobierno estadounidense – cosa que no solo limita el uso de las mismas por los viequenses, sino que las pone en riesgo de ser militarizadas nuevamente. Recientemente los activistas se reunieron para desarrollar una estrategia que logre la devolución de esas tierras a manos de los viequenses de una vez y por todas.

Desarrollo: La atención mundial lograda por Vieques también atrajo la atención de especuladores y otros extranjeros, lo cual ha ocasionado un alza dramática en el valor de la propiedad. Esto también pone en peligro la habilidad de los viequenses de permanecer en su propia isla. La creación de un fideicomiso comunal es uno de los pocos mecanismos dentro del mercado capitalista que podría en alguna medida frenar el alza del precio de las tierras. También crearía una entidad que podría recibir y administrar las tierras una vez sean regresadas. Si los viequenses pueden recobrar su amada isla, cuidarla, desarrollarla, y darle estabilidad a sus comunidades, la muerte de David Sanes no habrá sido en vano.

Source: http://boricuahumanrights.org/2009/04/09/vieques-la-lucha-continua-reflections-on-10-years-since-the-death-of-david-sanes/

Navy tells Rep. Serrano that it has no plans to return to Vieques

This press release from Congressman Jose Serrano states that the Navy has no intention of resuming training in Vieques.

Congressman José E. Serrano

Representing the Sixteenth District of New York

PRESS RELEASE

-4361

Serrano Announces Navy Has No Intention of Reopening Training Range On
Vieques

March 20, 2009 – Washington, DC – This afternoon, Congressman José E. Serrano received confirmation from the Navy’s Congressional Relations office that the Navy has no intention of reopening Vieques as a training range.

“I am pleased to hear that the Navy has no plans to return to Vieques,” said Serrano. “The people of Vieques have suffered enough. I am glad that the Navy now realizes the harm that has been caused, and agrees that this painful chapter in the history of Puerto Rico must remain closed.”

###

Congressman José E. Serrano has represented the Bronx in Congress since 1990. He is the most senior Puerto Rican Member of Congress.

Puerto Ricans reject renewed military activity in Vieques

Recent news reports that the military was considering returning to Vieques to conduct training has sparked renewed anger  in Puerto Rico.   Puerto Rico’s delegate to Congress, Pedro Pierluisi, has even come out against renewed military activity in Vieques, a 180 degree reversal of an earlier statement welcoming new military activity.  Here’s an article from the Navy Times.

Military draws anger with new look at Vieques

By Mike Melia – The Associated Press

Posted : Saturday Mar 21, 2009 9:23:55 EDT

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico – Six years after angry protesters chased the Navy out of Vieques, the U.S. military has provoked a new outcry by suggesting it could re-establish a presence on the tiny Puerto Rican island.

In testimony before a Senate committee this week, military leaders said the island once known for its bombing range is well placed to extend America’s reach in the Caribbean, potentially playing a role in airspace surveillance or fighting drug traffickers.

Activists and government officials in the U.S. territory say they are ready for another resistance fight. Protests against the bombing united islanders of all political stripes and the Navy’s departure in 2003 from Vieques was celebrated as a victory for Puerto Rico.

“We the Puerto Ricans fought for so many years to end the bombing and to have the land turned over to the people of Vieques. We are opposed to it being used for anything else, much less that it go back to the military,” Jose Paralitici, a veteran anti-Navy activist, said Thursday.

Puerto Rico’s delegate to Congress, Pedro Pierluisi, has issued a statement rejecting any military exercises on the island, backtracking on an earlier statement that the government was open to a military presence that did not involve more shelling.

The U.S. began war maneuvers on the island off Puerto Rico’s east coast in 1948 after buying 25,000 acres – about two-thirds of the island – to create the bombing range.

Two errant bombs killed a civilian security guard in 1999, sparking mass protests that also blamed the military for fouling the environment on the island of 9,000 people. Then-President George W. Bush announced in 2001 that the Navy would stop Vieques operations two years later.

The island has since placed new emphasis on tourism. A cleanup began in 2005 to clear thousands of unexploded rockets, cluster bombs and other munitions from the site of the former training range that is now a Fish and Wildlife Service refuge.

In the testimony Tuesday before the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee, Air Force Gen. Victor E. Renuart Jr., chief of the U.S. Northern Command, said the area could contribute to national defense “on a small basis.”

“We are looking to work with both the Navy and the National Guard to see how we might take advantage of some of the systems and equipment that is still in place in the Vieques area,” Renuart said.

A spokesman for the Northern Command, Canadian navy Lt. Desmond James, said he could not discuss the topic because a Senate request is pending for a more thorough answer.

The assessment was requested by Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla., who said at the hearing that several years have passed since “we lost the battle of Vieques.”

Existing facilities in Vieques could play a key role in missions including counterterrorism, anti-piracy and humanitarian assistance, he said Thursday.

With the loss of its training area, the Navy also closed the Roosevelt Roads Naval Station on the eastern coast of the Puerto Rican mainland, which employed 6,300 people. That left Guantanamo Bay in Cuba as the only U.S. naval base in the Caribbean.

Source: http://www.navytimes.com/news/2009/03/ap_vieques_testing_032009/

U.S. military considering return to Vieques

http://www.caribbeanbusinesspr.com/news03.php?nt_id=27959&ct_id=1&ct_name=1

U.S. military considering return to Vieques

By CB Online Staff

Testimony at U.S. Senate committee hearing signals interest by military to return to island municipality in a limited capacity.

SAN JUAN (AP)_ Six years after protesters were able to get the U.S. Navy out of Vieques, military authorities are considering a return to the island municipality.

In a testimony before the U.S. Senate this week, military authorities said the island is in an ideal location to expand the nation’s reach in the Caribbean and could potentially play a role in air surveillance or the war against drugs.

The U.S. Navy’s exit in 2003 was considered a victory by a significant part of the Puerto Rican population. The military exercises carried out on the island were considered harmful to the island’s environment and to the health of its 9,000 inhabitants.

However, Resident Commissioner Pedro Pierluisi said Thursday the Puerto Rico government is open to establishing a low-impact military presence in Vieques.

Pierluisi, part of a new political administration in favor of Puerto Rico becoming the 51st state of the U.S., said the island has a “moral obligation,” of contributing to the nation’s defense.

“I am sure most of our people are more than willing to continue helping the U.S. Special Forces in any reasonable way that doesn’t include bombing our rare but valuable natural resources,” he stated in a declaration sent to the Associated Press.

The U.S. started military maneuvers on Vieques’ eastern coast in 1948 after obtaining 25,000 cuerdas (one cuerda is equal to 0.97 acres), about a third of the island municipality.

In 1999, protests against the military presence on the so-called Isla Nena grew in intensity after a bomb accidentally killed David Sanes, a Vieques-born security guard posted at an observation tower.

In 2001, then-U.S. President Bill Clinton announced the U.S. Navy would finish its maneuvers in Vieques. The Navy finally exited the island municipality in May 2003.

During his testimony before the Senate’s Armed Forces Committee Tuesday, Northern Command chief Gen. Victor E. Renuart Jr. said the island could contribute to the national defense, “in a limited capacity.”

“We want to work with the Navy and the National Guard to see how we can take advantage of some of the systems and equipment that are still on the island of Vieques,” Renuart said.

Vieques underwater ordnance leaking carcinogenic toxins

The study cited below looked at contamination from deteriorating underwater munitions in the sea around Vieques, Puerto Rico.  There are also thousands of tons of unexploded munitions, including chemical weapons, in the waters surrounding Hawai’i.  James Porter, the researcher from the University of Georgia, will be presenting his findings at an international conference on underwater munitions being held in Honolulu in February.  Here’s the link to the conference website: http://underwatermunitions.com/index.php

Old ordnance under the sea may be toxic – study

By CHRIS LAMBIE Staff Reporter

January 17, 2009

Unexploded munitions lying under the sea leak cancer-causing toxins, a new study shows.

The research, to be presented at a conference in Hawaii next month, looked at a naval gunnery and bombing range off Puerto Rico where many munitions failed to explode. But James Porter, the ecologist who conducted the study on reefs at the eastern end of Isla de Vieques, said he would expect to find the same results anywhere in the world that bombs and bullets have been dumped into the sea, including Nova Scotia.

“The problem that we have studied looks at the unexploded ordnance, which then lie on the sea floor, corrode and leak these toxic materials into the ocean,” Mr. Porter said Friday in a telephone interview from his office at the University of Georgia.

“It’s not a problem that’s isolated in one country. I would think every nation that has a coastline would have this problem.”

This province has more than its fair share of unexploded ordnance in its waters, said Terry Long, a Cape Breton man who is organizing next month’s Second International Dialogue on Underwater Munitions.

“There’s more than 3,000 munitions sites off the coast of Nova Scotia,” said Mr. Long, a former military engineer who now works on ordnance and munitions disposal.

“There are approximately 45 shipwrecks in Halifax Harbour, of which 35 contain munitions. The Bedford Basin is full of munitions from the 1945 (Bedford) Magazine explosion.”

Representatives of the Department of National Defence are slated to attend the Feb. 25-27 conference in Honolulu.

But a DND spokeswoman said she was unable to provide answers Friday to questions about dangers posed by unexploded ordnance in Canadian waters.

One of the most common toxins found in the Puerto Rico study was trinitrotoluene, commonly known as TNT.

“There were, in fact, eight different cancer-causing chemicals that we found in high concentrations,” Mr. Porter said.

He found the substances had made their way into corals and sea urchins in high concentrations.

“One coral colony had 600 milligrams per kilogram TNT in the flesh of a living coral,” he said. “That’s horrifically high, and it exceeds the (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s) cancer-causing safety standards.”

Toxins were also found in more mobile sea life, including lobster and fish, but those levels were within acceptable health limits, Mr. Porter said.

“The next study that needs to be done would be by oncologists, who would try to find out whether the seafood, which does have these chemicals in them – that’s what we’ve shown – is being consumed in quantities that would explain the cancers (in the local human population),” he said.

Militaries, including Canada’s, clean up their ranges on land by removing unexploded ordnance.

“One of the things I would like to see is to have that common practice of range maintenance extended to include the shallow, near-shore environment,” Mr. Porter said. “There’s no reason why these things shouldn’t be picked up. We can do it; we have the technology to do this.”

His co-author, James Barton, has built a remote-control machine that lifts unexploded ordnance off the ocean floor, puts it in a basket and sends it to the surface for disposal.

“It looks sort of like an underwater backhoe,” Mr. Porter said.

Cleaning up unexploded munitions off this province’s coasts would create work and help counter the effects of the recession, Mr. Long said.

“We’ve got 3,000 sites off Nova Scotia but we don’t have any cleanups going, not one active cleanup,” he said.

“The time is right. Let’s put our people to work and clean up these sites.”

(clambie@herald.ca)

© 2008 The Halifax Herald Limited

Source:http://thechronicleherald.ca/NovaScotia/1101147.html

Vieques Residents Alarmed by Depleted Uranium Reports

Published on Tuesday, January 30, 2001 by Inter Press Service

Vieques Residents Alarmed by Depleted Uranium Reports

by Carmelo Ruiz-Marrero

Residents of the island-town of Vieques are alarmed and angered by the United States military’s use of depleted uranium (DU) ammunition in a firing range located next to a civilian area.

Since 1941, Vieques has been used by the US Navy for target practice. During the last two years, Puerto Rican peace activists have engaged in a massive and unprecedented civil disobedience campaign to get the Navy to close its firing range there.

Vieques residents have followed with great concern the controversy raging in Europe over the use of DU in the 1999 NATO war against Yugoslavia. They remember very well the US Navy’s statements to the effect that most ships and aeroplanes that were used in that war were tested in Vieques.

According to a study carried out by the Puerto Rico Health Department, the cancer rate in Vieques is 26.9 percent above Puerto Rico’s average. The study, which covered the years 1990-94, says nothing about the possible causes of this unusually high cancer rate. But the Navy’s opponents are certain that military activities on the island, including target practice with DU munitions, are to blame.

Doctor Rafael Rivera-Castaño, who lives in Vieques, believes that the PR Health Department cancer study’s data are already somewhat dated, and that the current cancer rate in Vieques is even higher. ”I estimate that the cancer rate here is now 52 percent over the Puerto Rico average,” he said in an interview.

Members of the Committee for the Rescue and Development of Vieques (CRDV) recently met with environmental justice activists from the United States and heard their experiences with DU.

”We listened in horror as scientists and community activists from the US told about this new type of weaponry that had been used extensively in the Gulf War. We had recently heard retired Admiral Diego Hernández say that the ‘success’ of the US forces in Iraq was due in great measure to their practising in Vieques,” said CRDV spokesman Ismael Guadalupe.

”For years we have denounced the relationship between the military contamination and the exaggerated levels of cancer on Vieques. The heavy metals and other chemical components from explosives, dangerous to human health, combined with the radioactive uranium 238 projectiles, jeopardise the life of Viequenses today as well as future generations,” said Nilda Medina, also of the CRDV.

”There is no way to guarantee that the next bomb or cannon shot will not impact one of the uranium shells, putting into the air radioactive particles that could be air transported to the civilian sector, to our children, to our old folks, to any one of us. We urge the authorities responsible for our health and security to block any future bombing that puts in danger the entire Vieques community,” expressed Medina.

The Navy admitted that it had used DU ammunition in Vieques in a May 10, 1999 statement in response to a Freedom of Information Act request by the Military Toxics Project, a US-based organisation. In the communiqué, signed by B.L. Thompson, the Navy said that it fired DU rounds in Vieques once, in February 1999, and claims that it used only 263 airplane-fired, low-calibre rounds, and that it had been done by mistake.

However, military scientist Doug Rokke, one of the world’s leading authorities on DU, finds the last two claims unbelievable. ”If they fired 263 DU rounds in Vieques, then it’s going to snow in San Juan tomorrow,” he said.

During a recent visit to Puerto Rico and Vieques island Rokke said 263 rounds is ”not even a burst of automatic gunfire. The A-10 Warthog attack plane, which fires DU ammunition, can fire three to four thousand rounds per minute.” He added that it couldn’t have possibly been a mistake, since the Pentagon keeps very strict inventory of all its ammunition.

DU consists mostly of uranium 238 (U238), a by-product of uranium enrichment, the process through which uranium 235 (U235) is separated from the uranium ore. Both isotopes are radioactive, but unlike U235, U238 is useless for nuclear bombs or nuclear power. It is simply radioactive waste and it will remain radioactive for 4.5 billion years. The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission estimated in 1991 that there must be one million pounds of this material in the United States.

The US government has decided to dispose of this radioactive waste by selling it as ammunition. DU is an ideal material for bullets, since it is 70 percent more dense than lead, and is extremely susceptible to friction. Violent impacts can make it reach temperatures in the thousands of degrees Fahrenheit in a fraction of a second. For these reasons, a DU bullet can pierce a tank’s armour like a knife through butter and scorch the crew inside.

”These bullets are not coated or tipped with this material. They are pure, solid DU,” informed Rokke.

When a DU round is fired, 60 percent of its mass ends up as microscopic aerosol particles in the air, which can be carried miles downwind, according to the Military Toxics Project. Although it is less radioactive than weapons-grade U235, the group claims that a single DU particle a thousandth of a millimetre in size lodged inside a human lung emits 800 times the amount of radiation considered safe by federal standards.

The use of DU ammunition constitutes ”a crime against God and humanity”, declared Rokke, who directed the Pentagon’s Depleted Uranium Project and wrote its Cleanup and Handling Protocol for Depleted Uranium.

Based on his studies, he concluded that anyone who comes in contact with these munitions must get medical attention, not only those who have been fired at with them, but also those who have fired them, as well as anyone who has come near structures impacted by these bullets.

Rokke speaks from experience. He suffers from radiation poisoning since he visited the Persian Gulf area to study the effects of DU ordnance used by US forces in the 1991 war against Iraq. His urine contains 2000 times the amount of uranium considered normal.

In his view, DU is largely responsible for the unusual health problems that US veterans of the 1991 Gulf War have been suffering, known collectively as the ‘Gulf War Syndrome’. The military denies that there is any such causal relationship.

”Vieques must be the place to stop the criminal actions of the US armed forces, which use the cloak of secrecy to claim that there’s no danger in using depleted uranium ammunition and ignore veterans’ calls for medical attention, and refuse to take on their responsibility to clean up and decontaminate,” said Rokke.

Rokke also senses a pattern of environmental racism in the Pentagon’s decision to test DU in Vieques and in the Japanese island of Okinawa. ”The US Defence Department’s policy is racist and discriminatory, contrary to the principle of environmental justice. We have the cases of Vieques and Okinawa, where DU ammunition has been experimented with. These are not isolated events, or errors or chance. These are planned actions to test and later use this highly polluting ammunition in Kosovo and the Persian Gulf.”

The US Department of Defence claims that DU does not represent a significant hazard to human health. Its spokespersons refer to an April 1999 RAND Corporation study, which supports the military’s position.

But the RAND report is biased and incomplete, says ‘DoD Analysis: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly’, a report written by Dan Fahey, a former naval officer and currently Director of Research at the Gulf War Resource Centre. Fahey’s report, which was written for the US General Accounting Office, states that RAND made no reference at all to 62 relevant information sources.

According to Fahey, RAND ignored studies which demonstrate a clear relationship between DU and harm to human health, for example those carried out by the Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute.

US armed forces have already used these munitions extensively. During the 1991 Gulf War US troops fired an estimated 300 tons of it into civilian and military targets in Iraq.

According to Physicians for Social Responsibility, in the 1999 NATO war against Yugoslavia, US tanks fired 14,000 high-calibre DU rounds, while planes fired 940,000 smaller calibre DU bullets. US armed forces are not the only ones to use DU ammunition. Authorised arms dealers sell them to 16 countries, including Israel, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Taiwan.

Copyright 2001 IPS

###

Source: http://www.commondreams.org/cgi-bin/print.cgi?file=/headlines01/0130-03.htm

Vieques – Okinawa Solidarity

http://www.thegully.com/essays/puertorico/000807pr_okin.html

Vieques and Okinawa: Allies Against U.S. Troops

by Toby Eglund

AUGUST 7, 2000. As the U.S. Navy launches a second round of bombing exercises in the Puerto Rican island of Vieques, anti-Navy activists there are finding allies in Okinawa, Japan, where pacifist and environmental groups are renewing demands for a reduction of U.S. bases and troops.

Japanese and Puerto Rican activists are developing common strategies to oppose bombings on both islands, including coordinated acts of civil disobedience, and the creation of a permanent Okinawa-Vieques action and information network.

Carlos Zenon, a Vieques fisherman and longtime activist, was a keynote speaker at a massive protest in Okinawa, on July 20, in which more than 27,000 people formed a human chain around the Kadena U.S. Air Force base.

The demonstration took place shortly before a visit by President Clinton, who was in Japan for the G-8 economic summit, a gathering of the leaders of the eight richest countries of the world. Zenon was accompanied by Sheila Velez Martinez, of the Bar Association of Puerto Rico’s Comission on Vieques.

In Vieques, the U.S. Navy occupies two-thirds of the 52-square-mile island (1/3 at each end sandwiching 9,300 civilians in between), expropriated from residents in 1941. Vieques residents have a variety of complaints, ranging from errant missiles, environmental damage from both live and inert bombs, an elevated cancer rate possibly related to bombing materials like depleted uranium, abuse of civil and human rights, and destruction of tourism and the fishing industry.

Okinawans share similar concerns, though the American military presence has helped their local economy. The recent case of a Marine entering an unlocked house and molesting a sleeping 14-year-old girl has inflamed anti-American sentiment. Okinawans blame U.S. troops for crimes ranging from thefts and assaults to rapes and killings.

The United States returned control of Japan’s southern islands to Tokyo in 1972, but U.S. military bases continue to occupy about 20 percent of Okinawa, and are home to 26,000 troops, half of U.S. forces in Japan.

Vieques activists have also found support in Korea, Hawaii and the Phillipines, where U.S. military installations are blamed for environmental contamination and violations of civil and human rights of local residents.

New Bombings
The Vieques-Okinawa alliance comes as the U.S. Navy deploys in Vieques the USS Harry S. Truman Battle Group, which includes 15 ships and 12,000 sailors. The air, ship and submarine training at Vieques and surrounding seas, will again involve shelling and bombing the island. The exercises could run until August 24.

Protests will continue on both Vieques, and on the main island of Puerto Rico. Sunday afternoon, thousands of protesters demonstrated in front of the U.S. Army’s Fort Buchanan. Navy spokesperson, Lt. Jeff Gordon, who had earlier characterized Vieques protesters as “thugs,” said the march was “part of a multi-million dollar smear campaign” directed by groups who want independence for Puerto Rico. He neither named the groups, nor specified how these alleged funds, huge by Puerto Rico standards, were raised.

Despite earlier Navy warnings that entering the restricted areas in Vieques would be much harder, a group of thirty-two women, headed by eleven from Vieques, penetrated security and held a demonstration in the bombing zone, before being arrested at 5 A.M. Monday morning. The group included women from religious organizations and trade unions, four lesbian civil rights activists, and others.

More than 400 Vieques protesters have been arrested since May. Two hundred of them were arrested for trespassing, and nine sailors were injured, during training exercises by the USS George Washington Battle Group in June. Several of the protesters remain in jail. They have refused to post bail, saying they don’t recognize the jurisdiction of U.S. federal courts in Puerto Rico, considered a colony by the United Nations.

Image Control
According to the Vieques Times, the Navy recently hired a Virginia ad agency in a belated attempt to improve its image and convince Vieques residents that it can be a good neighbor. The Navy’s objective is to persuade Vieques voters to allow the Navy to stay on the island ad infinitum and resume live bombing, if and when the question is addressed in a referendum.

In the meantime, the Navy is transferring the island’s western third, a former ammunition dump, to Puerto Rico, though many question whether the people of Vieques (from whom it was expropriated) will actually be given the land, or whether it will end up in the hands of real estate developers, as was the case on the neighboring island of Culebra.

The Navy has also promised to promote economic development on Vieques with $40 million allocated by Congress. Again, Vieques activists remain skeptical, since all the money from a similar, earlier plan was squandered on “administrative” costs.

President Clinton also tried his hand at military image control during his visit to the Kadena U.S. Air Force base in Okinawa: he told troops to be good neighbors and behave with honor.

Related links:

To find out what the Navy’s up to on Vieques go to The Vieques Times.

For the U.S. Navy’s viewpoint.

For up-to-the-minute info on Vieques protests go to Vieques Libre.

 OpenCUNY » login | join | terms | activity 

 Supported by the CUNY Doctoral Students Council.  

OpenCUNY.ORGLike @OpenCUNYLike OpenCUNY

false