Lingle still courting militarized Superferry and 'science cities' on Haleakala and Mauna Kea

At a talk on Maui, Governor Lingle said if she could she would bring back the Hawaii Superferry.   “Lingle said she’s been in recent contact with the ferries’ builder, Austal, which is considering military contracts for the high-speed vehicle transports.” Lingle also said she supports the development of “science cities” on Haleakala and Mauna Kea, both sites that are threatened by military space research.

>><<

Updated at 7:51 a.m., Saturday, September 5, 2009

Downturn offers opportunity, Lingle says

By CHRIS HAMILTON
The Maui News

WAILEA, Maui – Gov. Linda Lingle told the Maui Native Hawaiian Chamber of Commerce on Friday that the economic downturn provided Hawaii with a chance to focus on alternative energy sources rather than continuing to rely on fossil fuels.

Her administration has and will continue to pursue new business opportunities in order to diversify the state’s tourism-based economy, she said in a wide-ranging discussion.

Lingle was the keynote speaker at the Grand Wailea Resort Hotel & Spa during the chamber’s third annual “Business Fest.” The Republican governor who is nearing the start of her last year in office also addressed topics from the Superferry; to looming deficits in county budgets; to the message given by economist Leroy Laney on Maui on Thursday that the recession is probably over.

Lingle said she agreed with Laney, who is an adviser to First Hawaiian Bank and professor at Hawaii Pacific University, saying the economic recovery will take time.

“Of course, we want it to be a quick recovery,” Lingle said to a mostly receptive crowd of about 150 people who twice gave her standing ovations. “But we have opportunities with this gradual recovery. It gives us time to decide what we are for as well as what we are against.

“Shame on us” if Hawaii emerges in the same position it was in prior to the recession, she said.

During the course of the past two years of economic decline, Lingle said, her administration has been able to set new priorities for Hawaii’s economy and Maui’s. She identified those as energy security and education, including retraining laid-off workers for “the new economy.”

Hawaii exports $7 billion a year, mostly to foreign nations, by importing 97 percent of its energy from fossil fuels, Lingle noted. Her vision would convert the state to 70 percent clean energy sources, such as solar, wave, biofuels and wind power, in just one generation, she said.

She predicted that the Native Hawaiian Chamber of Commerce will only continue to gain influence in the coming years as developers and entrepreneurs seek the group’s advice and endorsements. For instance, she said a massive public-private wind farm planned for Molokai will need the blessing of Native Hawaiian groups in order to create infrastructure, such as an underwater power line between Molokai and Oahu.

Lingle also said she supports the proposed advanced technology solar telescope at Science City on Haleakala and a similar telescope project on the Big Island, both of which combine to cost more than $2 billion to build but have encountered opposition from some Native Hawaiians who view the gigantic telescopes as eyesores encroaching on extremely significant spiritual places.

However, the Maui telescope alone will create 100 construction jobs and dozens of permanent staff drawn from the local population – who will receive more than $40 million worth of education, Lingle said.

“If you’re not for a project like this, than what are you for?” Lingle said.

Otherwise, Maui will continue to be stuck relying on tourism, with the same ups and downs, she said.

A few audience members could be seen quietly rolling their eyes at the apparent lecture from Lingle.

As she delivered a message encouraging positivity, the governor also managed to take a few jabs at the policies of her political opponents in the Legislature and local government. She called the legislature’s effort to raise the hotel tax rate counterproductive when occupancy rates are their lowest on record.

And she was also critical of Maui’s “show me the water” ordinance, which requires new developments to provide their own water sources. She lumped it with the county’s work force housing legislation, which requires developers to build affordable housing to accompany their luxury home projects.

The combined result has been a lack of new real estate investment in Maui, she said.

Proponents have said the ordinances are necessary so working families can afford to live on Maui.

It could take Maui longer to recover than the other islands, the former Maui County mayor said, since decades ago it positioned itself successfully as a high-end, exclusive island.

“I still feel that that was the right decision,” she said.

Lingle called on audience members to speak out in favor of issues they support rather than engage in opposition politics and lopsided protests.

The governor also took a few moments to address her ongoing and undecided battle with the public employees’ unions. She said if they had accepted her offer for weekly furloughs months ago, the employees wouldn’t be facing layoffs, now said to be in the thousands.

“We could have rectified this situation long ago,” Lingle said.

With the most recent state budget forecasts, the state is facing a nearly $1 billion shortfall. Maui County did not have to cut its budget significantly for the 2010 fiscal year.

However, Lingle said that since county property value appraisals often lag as long as 18 months behind state tax revenue forecasts and collections, she predicted that Maui County will have serious deficits soon, likely in the next two fiscal years.

Shortly after the speech, Maui County Managing Director Sheri Morrison said she agreed with Lingle’s dire predictions.

“She right,” Morrison said. “We will have to face up to those facts.”

During Lingle’s question-and-answer period, she was asked what she thought of Hawaii Superferry’s prospects. The interisland ferry left the islands and went bankrupt months ago after a judge ruled that Lingle and the Legislature hadn’t properly followed environmental law in pursuing the more than $350 million investment here.

Luncheon emcee Ron Vaught asked Lingle about the status of Superferry.

She said, “If I could, I would” bring it back. The two completed ferries now sit at a shipyard in Maryland. Lingle said she’s been in recent contact with the ferries’ builder, Austal, which is considering military contracts for the high-speed vehicle transports.

In the meantime, the state will “carry on” and work to complete the required environmental impact statement. Superferry was good for business, and the majority of people wanted it, she said.

Lingle called the lack of political leadership in support of Superferry “pathetic,” and said there were severe consequences as a result. The Alakai ferry was good for businesses that quickly embraced it as an affordable and fast way to ship goods between Maui and the state’s population center, Honolulu, she said.

Superferry critics, many of whom are Maui Democrats, said Lingle tried an end-run around environmental law by allowing the ferry to operate between Maui and Oahu without a completed EIS. The island risked potential cultural, traffic and environmental impacts because of the ferry system, they’ve said.

Lingle concluded the hourlong talk with a question about her political ambitions after she leaves office at the end of 2010. Lingle said she is too preoccupied with Hawaii’s current problems and has no plans now to run for another office.

“I just have to stay focused on what I’m doing now,” Lingle said.

Source: http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20090905/BREAKING01/90905010/Downturn+offers+opportunity++Lingle+says

Mauna Kea selected for more desecration

Posted on: Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Mauna Kea selected for world’s largest telescope

Native Hawaiians, environmentalists object to use of area

By Mary Vorsino
Advertiser Staff Writer

Mauna Kea was chosen yesterday as the site for what will become the world’s largest telescope – a mega-feat of engineering that will cost $1.2 billion, create as many as 440 construction and other jobs and seal the Big Island summit’s standing as the premier spot on the planet to study the mysteries of space.
Advertisement
Quantcast

But opposition to the project from environmental and Native Hawaiian groups could still prove a formidable hurdle for making the telescope a reality. Marti Townsend, program director for Kahea: The Hawaiian Environmental Alliance, said opposition groups will go to court to stop the project if needed.

“This is a bad decision done in bad faith,” Townsend said.

The new telescope – known as the Thirty Meter Telescope – is set to be completed in 2018, following seven years of construction. Astronomers say the project is expected to spur big advances in their field and offer new insight into the universe and its celestial bodies, including whether any far-away planets are capable of sustaining life.

The TMT will be able to see 13 billion light years away, a distance so great and so far back in time that researchers predict they’ll be able to watch the first stars and galaxies in the universe forming.

“It will really provide the baby pictures of the universe,” said Charles Blue, a media relations specialist with the Thirty Meter Telescope Observatory Corp.

Mauna Kea’s 13,796-foot summit was picked as the site for the new telescope over Chile’s Cerro Armazones mountain after more than a year of study, providing some rare good news for Hawai’i construction industry officials in today’s dismal economy.

“This is definitely going to be a shot in the arm for our industry,” said Kyle Chock, executive director of Pacific Resource Partnership, a labor-management organization that represents the Hawaii Carpenters Union along with some 240 contractors. Chock said building the telescope will require 50 to 100 construction workers daily.

TMT Observatory has pledged to make sure many of those jobs go to Hawai’i residents.

Another 140 jobs will be created for operations over the life of the telescope.

“It’s a huge announcement,” Chock said.

In a news release yesterday, Gov. Linda Lingle said the decision to build the telescope in the Islands “marks an extraordinary step forward in the state’s continuing efforts to establish Hawai’i as a center for global innovation for the future.” She added, “Having the most advanced telescope in the world on the slopes of Mauna Kea will enhance Hawai’i’s high-technology sector, while providing our students with education and career opportunities” in science.
strong objection

The telescope has also been met with strong opposition from Native Hawaiian and environmental groups.

Mauna Kea is considered sacred to Native Hawaiians, while environmentalists have raised concerns about how the project will affect rare native plant and insect species atop the volcano. That opposition could affect work on the new telescope, especially if those against the project decide to head to court.

“The people are stuck. What are we going to do? Sue or lose our rights,” said Kealoha Pisciotta, president of Mauna Kea Anaina Hou, which participated in a 2007 legal challenge that helped derail plans for a $50 million addition to the W.M. Keck Observatory.

The new telescope is much bigger than that project. A draft environmental impact statement estimates that the site for the project will cover approximately 5 acres on the summit, with a 30-meter segmented mirror in a 180-foot dome housing, a 35,000-square-foot support building and a parking area. The TMT project also calls for a mid-level facility on Mauna Kea at 9,200 feet along with headquarters at the University of Hawai’i-Hilo.

Sandra Dawson, EIS manager for the project, said TMT officials have had multiple public meetings and sit-downs with residents to get their thoughts on the telescope. She has gotten about 300 comments to the draft EIS, which are being reviewed.

“What we’re hoping for is that people who have in the past been in opposition will work with us to try to make this as acceptable as possible,” she said. “We’re going to do everything we can” to work with people.
14 telescopes

The telescope will be the 14th on Mauna Kea. It will require a permit from the state Department of Land and Natural Resources, which TMT officials are hopeful won’t be delayed. Meanwhile, the University of Hawai’i is in negotiations with TMT over the project. UH manages the summit of Mauna Kea, and Dawson said the university will get observing time in the new telescope as part of a lease.

TMT officials expect to finalize the EIS on the project by the end of the year. They expect to kick off construction in 2011.

Virginia Hinshaw, UH-Manoa chancellor, said in a statement that the project is “tremendously exciting for Hawai’i and will bring benefits both to our astronomers and certainly to our citizens through workforce development and science education.”

She added the decision to choose the Islands as the site for the cutting-edge telescope highlights the role “of Hawai’i … (in) advances in our understanding of the universe.”

UH-Hilo Chancellor Rose Tseng said the new telescope “holds great potential.”

“I’m doing everything I can to create the conditions under which a project like TMT can succeed on Mauna Kea and benefit the community,” she said.

TMT will be built by the University of California, the California Institute of Technology and the Association of Canadian Universities for Research in Astronomy.

About $300 million has been pledged so far for the construction of the new telescope, said TMT’s media specialist Blue. About $50 million has been pledged for design and development.

He said despite the economic downturn, “we’re confident the remaining funding can be secured.”

The new telescope will allow astronomers the clearest picture of space ever.

With it, astronomers will be able to view objects nine times fainter than with existing telescopes.

“It’s going to keep Hawai’i at the center of the world of astronomy,” said Taft Armandroff, director of the W.M. Keck Observatory, which has twin telescopes atop Mauna Kea with 10-meter mirrors, currently the world’s largest. “It’s a real validation that Mauna Kea is one of the absolute best places in the world to do astronomy.”

Reach Mary Vorsino at mvorsino@honoluluadvertiser.com.

Source: http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20090722/NEWS01/907220344/Mauna+Kea+selected+for+world+s+largest+telescope

Hilo residents blast giant telescope plan

Scope faces critics in Hilo

by Peter Sur
Tribune-Herald Staff Writer

Published: Thursday, June 18, 2009 9:39 AM HST

More than 150 people heard impassioned speeches Wednesday night in Hilo on a proposal to bring the Thirty Meter Telescope to the Big Island.

Much of it was negative, in stark contrast to Tuesday night’s meeting in Waimea. While the first four speakers in Waimea spoke glowingly of bringing the advanced observatory to Hawaii, the first six speakers in Hilo all slammed the idea. But as the night wore on, more people spoke in favor of the project. The meeting was still ongoing as of press time, with 14 in favor of the telescope and 14 against.

READ MORE

Public gets snow job on proposed giant Mauna Kea telescope

Telescope receives a warm reception in Waimea

by Peter Sur
Tribune-Herald Staff Writer

Published: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 9:45 AM HST

Majority of speakers during meeting voices support for TMT

WAIMEA — A friendly crowd filled an elementary school cafeteria Tuesday night to speak in favor of locating the Thirty Meter Telescope in Hawaii.

The Waimea meeting was the first of six meetings being held around the Big Island, plus one on Oahu. If approved and completed on time, an observatory with a primary mirror 98 feet across could be up and operating on the north slope of Mauna Kea by 2018.

TMT board members will meet July 20-21 in California to decide whether to build the telescope on Mauna Kea or on Cerro Armazones, a remote mountain in Chile.

The mood in Waimea, home of the W.M. Keck Observatory headquarters, was not unanimous, but of the 16 people who spoke, nine favored the TMT. A smaller number was opposed to bringing the telescope and the rest were ambivalent.

Richard Ha, a farmer and member of the Hawaii Economic Development Board’s TMT Committee, spoke of his efforts to have TMT fund a $1 million community benefits package.

Judi Steinman, executive officer of the Hawaii Island Chamber of Commerce, told a crowd of about 50 people that the chamber “strongly supports the TMT coming to Hawaii Island.”

“Our members see the TMT as an important part of our island’s business community to ensure the strength of our economy,” Steinman said.

“We can have a balance between Hawaiian culture and science,” said Mark Lossing, who said he represented more than 500 unemployed construction workers. “I also support the TMT because it will provide Big Island jobs.”

Andrew Cooper argued the scientific benefits of the telescope while wearing a yellow button that said, “TMT YES!”

Keawe Vredenburg took a different tack, asking for the development of a “Mauna Kea Protocol Management Plan” to protect the mountain’s numerous cultural resources.

Clarence “Ku” Ching disagreed. He was one of the plaintiffs in the court case that led to the development of the Mauna Kea Comprehensive Management Plan [CMP], and remains a strong opponent of building the TMT in Hawaii.

“I believe that the draft EIS (environmental impact statement), which is the subject of tonight’s discussion, is tainted. It’s … full of misrepresentations, deceit and fraud.”

[ku: What I said was that the EIS was principledly based on the CMP (being challenged in a Contested Case Hearing and will probably be modified) and the Mauna Kea 2000 Plan (unapproved by BLNR) – and that if “they” do not remove all references to these 2 documents – they would be crossing the boundary of misrepresentation, deceit and fraud.]

Wiley Knight, a former technician for the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope, asked that the TMT be built where the aging NASA Infrared Telescope Facility stands, instead of a “pristine area.”

Before the meeting, TMT representatives provided a preview of their presentations for the news media and answered some of the objections that Kealoha Pisciotta, an opponent of the telescope, had publicly raised.

Pisciotta had said, among other things, that the acceptance of federal funds triggers the need for a federal EIS.

“The federal government, federal agencies, they make that decision. We don’t. And what triggers NEPA (National Environmental Protection Act) is a significant federal action,” said Michael Bolte, director of California’s Lick Observatory and member of the TMT Board of Directors.

Regarding the Mauna Kea Comprehensive Management Plan, “we are an independent process. The legal opinions are that right now we can go forward completely independent of anything that happens with the Comprehensive Management Plan.”

[ku: This is utter bullshit! Without an adequate CMP – I believe that we can get an injunction to stop any construction that they think they can begin to put up there. In our court appeal – Judge Hara “stopped” any future construction on the mountain “until” a CMP was in place. So we’ll see which way it goes. This sounds like the TMT throwing down the gauntlet – that I’m sure we’ll be willing to take on the challenge.]

Two people commented on the spelling “Maunakea” in the EIS, said Sandra Dawson, environmental impact statement manager for the TMT. She explained that the University of Hawaii, not TMT officials, chose to spell Mauna Kea as one word.

Jim Hayes spoke on behalf of Parsons Brinckerhoff, the consulting firm that produced the EIS.

Hayes explained how consultants focused on impacts to culture and historical resources, biology and aesthetics, because those areas were singled out in earlier meetings.

“There’s no historic properties within 200 feet of the project, and there’s no unique or prime geologic areas in the disturbance area,” Hayes said. “We found the project would have minimal impact in the cinder cone habitat area, which is the most sensitive area.”

The impacts of the 50 people working at the observatory daily would be mitigated by the mandatory “ride-sharing” for crews from Hale Pohaku, resulting in an estimated 12 vehicle trips per day.

Remaining issues to be resolved include the specific route for the access road, the level of decommissioning and whether the enclosure should be painted white, brown or with the preferred reflective finish.

Anneila Sargent, an astronomy professor at the California Institute of Technology, touted the myriad scientific benefits of the TMT, including an advanced adaptive optics system that would allow for images 10 times sharper than the Hubble Space Telescope.

TMT, she said, would allow a deeper, sharper view of the universe in the visible and infrared spectra than any observatory that exists today — back to the formation of the first stars 13.3 billion light-years away.

More important than being able to image distant stars, arguably, will be an advanced instrument called a spectroscope, which can analyze the chemical elements of distant stars and even determine whether they have planets.

“The potential for what we can find is just astonishing,” Sargent said.

The next meeting is today from 4 to 8 p.m. in the Hilo High School cafeteria.

E-mail Peter Sur at psur@hawaiitribune-herald.com.

Call to Action to protect Haleakala and Mauna Kea!

Plans for major construction in the sensitive ecosystems of our most sacred summits continue to push forward, despite significant opposition from the community. The University of Hawaii has filed two environmental impact statements — one for the world’s largest telescope in the world’s only tropical alpine desert, and another for a duplicative solar telescope in one of the most threatened national parks in the U.S. Both of these projects can be built in less sensitive areas.

Though both summits are protected as conservation districts, where the law expressly discourages construction, the University refuses to compromise, insisting that these giant, intrusive structures be built where they will cause the most harm.

Don’t let good science be used to justify unnecessary ecological destruction and cultural disrespect. Take action now to defend our sacred, fragile summits.

1) Protect Haleakala — the House of the Sun — from another, unnecessary solar telescope (http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2699/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=1037)

2) Defend the Sacred Summit of Mauna Kea from the World’s Largest Telescope
(http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2699/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=1129)

Public hearings on the proposal to build the world’s largest telescope on Mauna Kea are being held now. All meetings are 5 to 8 p.m., with an open house in the beginning, followed by formal presentations, and then comments from the public.

Public Hearings on the New Mauna Kea Telescope Proposal

June 16 (Tuesday) Waimea – Waimea Elementary School Cafeteria

June 17 (Wednesday) Hilo – Hilo High School Cafeteria

June 18 (Thursday) Puna – Pahoa High School Cafeteria

June 22 (Monday) Ka’u – Ka’u High/Pahala Elementary School Cafeteria

June 23 (Tuesday) Hawi – Kohala Cultural Center

June 24 (Wednesday) Kona – Kealakehe Elementary School Cafeteria

June 25 (Thursday) Honolulu – Farrington High School Cafeteria

The Draft EIS is available on the Project website — www.TMT-HawaiiEIS.org — and hard copies can be found at public libraries throughout Hawaii.

Mahalo nui,
Us Guys at KAHEA: The Hawaiian-Environmental Alliance

1149 Bethel St., #415
Honolulu, HI 96813
www.kahea.org
blog.kahea.org
phone: 808-524-8220
email: kahea-alliance@hawaii.rr.com

Good Friday: Modern Day Crucifixion — Launching the Drone Wars from Hawaii to Pakistan

GOOD FRIDAY

Modern Day Crucifixion — Launching the Drone Wars from Hawaii to Pakistan

Today is Good Friday in the Christian calendar, the day Jesus was executed by the Roman Empire for the crime of sedition (stirring up the people) in occupied Palestine. One’s standpoint determines one’s viewpoint. From Jesus’ standpoint, and all those nailed to the cross of empire, there was nothing good about “Good Friday.” For the Roman Empire and their local collaborators, it was “Good Friday” indeed. They got rid of another troublemaker, or so they thought.

The Romans, like all empires, believed in a myth — that violence was a solution to problems. Jesus knew otherwise — that being willing to die, but not to kill, is the way to new life, justice and peace. His witness proved that the blood of martyrs is the seed of a new movement of non-violent resistance, what others call — the church. For over 200 years to be a member of this new church meant you refused to participate in the wars of empire. Thousands were crucified for their refusal and the church grew by leaps and bounds.

What of us today in the American Empire, after six years of war and occupation in Iraq, eight years of war and occupation in Afghanistan, and ll6 years of occupation of the Kingdom of Hawaii? The silence of “the church” today in Hawaii is deafening? Where are the voices of conscience in our local churches today speaking out for justice and peace and against war and occupation? How many Christians are refusing to participate in the wars of empire? How many churches are actively supporting the empire’s wars?

In 2 days of testimony this week about the militarization and desecration of the sacred temple of Mauna Kea, there wasn’t one church leader (Christian, Buddhist, or otherwise) who spoke in solidarity with Hawaii’s host people, the Kanaka Maoli calling out for justice and respect, and a halt to development on the mountain. The military has plans for a Pan Stars telescope on Mauna Kea for tracking “enemy” satellites to be destroyed in U.S. pre-emptive wars. A new billion dollar 30-meter telescope is also in the works. Kihei Soli Niheu says that the desecration on Mauna Kea is part of the ongoing illegal occupation of the Kingdom of Hawaii that must end.

The sacred mountains of both Mauna Kea and Mauna Loa are being militarized by expanded military live-fire training at Pohakuloa, including Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) otherwise known as drone airplanes. U.S. hunter-killer drones (MQ-1 Predators and more advanced MQ-9 Reapers) are now being used widely as surveillance and missile-firing aircraft in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. U.S. Centcom commander General David Petraeus calls this drone form of modern crucifixion “the right of last resort” to take out “threats” (as well as innocent people who just happen to be in the vicinity). Large numbers of innocent people are now fleeing their homes due to U.S. drone attacks in Central Asia.

Good Friday is a good day to break the silence and be stirred into action

1. Mourn all victims of violence. 2. Reject war as a solution. 3. Defend civil liberties. 4. Oppose all discrimination, anti-Islamic, anti-Semitic, etc. 5. Seek peace through justice in Hawai`i and around the world.
Contact: Malu `Aina Center for Non-violent Education & Action P.O. Box AB Kurtistown, Hawai`i 96760.
Phone (808) 966-7622. Email ja@interpac.net http://www.malu-aina.org
Hilo Peace Vigil leaflet (April l0, 2009 – 395th week) – Friday 3:30-5PM downtown Post Office

UH makes moves to seize control of Mauna Kea

The University of Hawai’i (UH) is responsible for the illegal, haphazard and destructive overdevelopment of Mauna Kea, one of the most sacred sites for Kanaka Maoli (Native Hawaiians).  But UH has always been the tenant of the mountain, which gave some degree of independent oversight by a separate state agency.  Kanaka Maoli have successfully fought off the massive expansion of Keck telescopes on Mauna Kea (which violated the management plan).  But UH now wants to build the largest telescope in the world – the Thirty Meter Telescope – on Mauna Kea and the Air Force wants to build the PanSTARRS telescope there.   So UH is pushing for legislation and approval of a management plan that turns the authority for Mauna Kea over to UH itself – the  proverbial fox guarding the hen house.  Time to stop the desecration! See the following article from the Hawai’i Independent about the current state of the struggle over Mauna Kea.

King of the mountain?

Posted March 18th, 2009 in Hawaii Island by Alan McNarie

It’s become a familiar pattern in recent years: a developer gets the go-ahead for a project from various state and/or county agencies. Then the developer and the government agencies get sued by citizens’ groups for not following the state’s own laws. The courts side with the activists. Then, instead of complying with the court ruling, the developer asks the state Legislature to change the law it broke.

It happened with Hokulia. It happened with the Hawaii Superferry. And now, according to some environmentalists and native Hawaiians, it’s happening again-only this time, the developer is the University of Hawaii, and the property in question is the top of Mauna Kea.

For decades, the university has been paying the state’s Department of Land and Natural Resources a dollar a year for the mountaintop, then subleasing sites there to various institutions that erect huge telescopes. The telescope consortiums pay the university a dollar plus telescope viewing time for UH Institute for Astronomy’s professors and students. For decades, activists have been complaining that the university has been damaging the mountain’s environment. They complained that the university’s own development plan had called for no more than 13 scopes on the mountain-yet that number had already been exceeded and the university was still considering applications for even more and bigger facilities. Native Hawaiians argued that the big scopes were desecrating their sacred mountain, damaging ancient cultural sites and interfering with their religious and cultural practices. Environmentalists noted that telescope construction had destroyed much of the native habitat for the wekiu bug, an endangered insect that lives only in the cindery upper regions of Mauna Kea.

The activists point to a federal environmental impact statement that found “cumulative and significant adverse impacts generated by the astronomical activities on the summit,” in violation of the state’s mandates for management of a conservation district. They note that the dollar-a-year leases violated Hawai`i Revised Statutes 171-18, which requires the Board of Land and Natural Resources (BLNR) to collect “fair market value” rents from lessees of state lands.

The campaigners won a significant victory in August of 2002, when Circut Court Judge Glenn Hara ruled that the university and the BLNR could not approve any new telescope development until the BLNR had developed a truly comprehensive land-management plan for the Mauna Kea summit area. The BLNR recently dropped its appeal of that case, but the activists’ motion for court costs is still under consideration. Meanwhile, in response to that case, a draft Comprehensive Management Plan came out last month-but it was written under the aegis of the university’s Office of Mauna Kea Management (OMKM), not the BLNR. The draft plan is currently available for review online at www.maunakeacmp.org. According to OMKM Director Stephanie Nagata, the BLNR may vote on the plan in April.

Even before the plan is approved, the university is pushing bills in the Legislature to give the OMKM the power to enforce the plan’s provisions. House Bill 1174 and Senate Bill 502 would grant agents of the university’s Mauna Kea Management Board and OMKM the right to make and enforce regulations governing visitors to the mountain, to restrict visitor access to daylight hours, to charge fees and levy fines on those visitors, and to keep the proceeds from those fees and fines in a special fund for managing the lands on the mountain top.

OMKM and its supporters claim that the bills and the management plan are simply giving the activists and the public what they’ve been asking for: better protection for Mauna Kea and its resources. But the bills’ opponents see it as a power grab by the university.

“The university and its attorney, Lisa Munger [also attorney for the Hawaii Superferry Inc.], recognize that they are unlikely to prevail on an appeal of the current laws protecting Mauna Kea. Thus, they are seeking to drastically change those laws to better favor their interests,” read a joint letter of testimony signed by plaintiffs in the court case.

“The Board of Land and Natural Resources and their staff should by law be writing that management plan-not the Board of Regents and not [UH-Hilo Chancellor] Rose Tseng,” believes Nelson Ho, who signed the letter for the Sierra Club. Ho says that if the bills pass as written, the groups will be back in court to challenge them.

“I do know that the Sierra Club has this position that the DLNR is abrogating their responsibility,” responds OMKM’s Nagata. But she maintains, “They’re not, for the very reason that they’re doing their own independent review and they’re approving the plan.”

Dodging Issues

Ho claims that the draft plan is “seriously flawed.”

“It repeats several lies again and again, in the hope that the Legislature and the BLNR see that as the truth,” he maintains. One of those “lies,” he says, is “that the industrial activities of international astronomy are not the problem on Mauna Kea. The problem is unrestricted access of people who bring up their plate lunches and leave their hamburger wrappers as debris.”
Nagata, not surprisingly, disagrees.

“I think he’s quite misguided in his interpretation of the management plan,” she says. “The major focus of the plan is a recognition particularly of the cultural significance, as well as the environmental significance of the mountain, and the plan is to provide us with guidelines for how to protect the cultural and natural resources from all kinds of uses and activities, including construction….”

The truth lies somewhere between their viewpoints. The plan does, in fact, address impacts from both observatory construction and from visitors. It requires an environmental monitor and an archeologist to be present at any future construction, for instance, with the power to halt construction if they see the need. It recommends that all visitors, telescope personnel and construction workers undergo an orientation session so that they will be more culturally and environmentally aware. It suggests a wash station to remove foreign seeds and insects from vehicles traveling up the mountain.

But the plan also deliberately avoids many of the issues that are among the sorest points for the community. Among the issues that it claims are “beyond the scope of this CMP”:
• Termination of the state lease between the university and the BLNR
• Use of ceded lands for $1 a year or nominal consideration
• Subleases between the university and the observatories
• Extension of the state lease beyond 2033
• Decommissioning [of obsolete telescopes]
• Proposed new development on Mauna Kea, including the Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT) and Pan Starrs
• Community benefit package with increased educational benefits
• Guaranteed employment opportunities for native Hawaiians and the people on the Island of Hawai‘i”

While the plan lists guidelines and recommendations for future construction, it leaves the question of whether more telescopes should be built to the university’s Board of Regents, with the guidance of a “2000 Master Plan” that was never approved by the BLNR.

Native Hawaiian Concerns

Among the thorniest issues on the mountain is the relationship between the university and native Hawaiians. The CMP devotes pages to the essential role that Mauna Kea plays in native Hawaiian beliefs and practices, and claims to model its recommendations on those beliefs and to consult native families with ties to the mountain. But the plan and the Legislative bills also call for university agents to have the power to regulate Hawaiian activities on Mauna Kea.

It became clear that the community had a number of issues and concerns related to past and future activities on Mauna Kea and specifically within the UH Management Areas that were beyond the scope of this CMP. These issues and concerns are cited below and policy makers are urged to consider them in their broader decision making related to Mauna Kea.

The plan calls for free access for native Hawaiian cultural uses, “except where safety, resource management, cultural appropriateness, and legal compliance considerations may require reasonable restrictions.” But it also calls for several restrictions on those practices. Hawaiians couldn’t be on the mountaintop after dark, for instance, without a special permit; they could only scatter the ashes of their dead with a special use permit. The MKMB and its Hawaiian advisory groups would have the authority to dismantle any ahu (stone cairns) or altars that it deems culturally inappropriate.

That last provision may strike an especially raw nerve with Kealoha Pisciotta, a native Hawaiian practitioner and former telescope technician who has become one of the university’s most adamant critics. Pisciotta once constructed an ahu on the mountain that contained a family pohaku (sacred stone). It was dismantled and the pohaku was hauled to the Hilo landfill.
Pisciotta see a multitude of problems with the university’s appointed officials defining and controlling Hawaiian practices.

“Now the university is determining not only when and how the ceremonies can be conducted, but who can be there…,” she notes. “I can get a permit to practice, but I can’t bring my mom or my sister or anybody else.”

Pisciotta says over a thousand opponents of the university’s plan have already sent their testimony to the legislature.

The authors of the CMP are very aware that the university has a public relations problem. The document begins by acknowledging that the “lack of cultural sensitivity engendered anger, hurt, and distrust towards the University of Hawai‘i for not being a good steward of Mauna Kea.” But the basic message seems to be, “We get it now.” The university is casting itself, through the CMP and the OMKM, as the solution.

“My interpretation of their [CMP opponents’] actions is that they prefer not to have the resources protected,” Nagata told the Independent.

But opponents obviously see it differently. For them, the bottom line is that the university continues to get free viewing time, the telescope consortiums continue to pay their one dollar rents, and if the mountain is going to be protected, all the other users will need to pay for it through fees and fines that the university gets to impose and spend. They see a “comprehensive management plan” that sidesteps some of the basic issues of planning, such as determining how many telescopes the mountain can support.

And no matter how good the plan is, many of its opponents just don’t trust the university, with its long record of ignoring its own recommendations, to police itself, much less the mountain’s other users.

“The CMP is not comprehensive. Even if it were a plan…the problem here is that they’re going to set a negative precedent with this bill by privatizing public land, putting it into the exclusive control of the developers,” believes Pisciotta.

Ho admits that if a body like OMKM were under the DLNR, it might meet some of his objections, at least “hypothetically.”

“But I would want to see the specific charges of that body, because, in fact the Board of Land and Natural Resources is that body, and they should be overseeing the writing of that plan,” he adds.
There is much in the CMP for its opponents to like. It does establish some guidelines for better supervision of telescope construction. It does endorse Hawaiian values in managing the mountain, and gives some Hawaiians a say in its management-if only Hawaiians appointed by the university. It does set up a framework for protecting Hawaiian cultural sites and the island’s wild denizens. But all of that may come to naught, because the plan doesn’t seriously address perhaps the biggest question of all: Should the University be king of the mountain?

Alan McNarie is a Hawai‘i-based journalist.

Source: http://www.thehawaiiindependent.com/hawaii/hawaii-island/2009/03/18/king-of-the-mountain/

Action Alert from KAHEA to Protect Mauna Kea!

Please take action to Protect Mauna Kea!

Your help is needed right now. Lobbyists for the University of Hawaii, backed by powerful foreign telescope-developers, are pushing hard to take control of Mauna Kea’s public trust resources and override the conservation laws currently barring further development on our sacred summits. If successful, they will use this authority to write their own rules, approve their own permits, and shut-out the public. Public trust resources cannot be protected if the developers are allowed to police themselves. Don’t let the politics of special interests undermine the public’s best interests. Take action now to help prevent the University’s power-grab.

Click Here to Take Action!

You can help stop UH’s land-grab on Mauna Kea’s sacred summit. After 40 years of mismanagement, tell the State Land Board and the Legislature that enough is enough!
“The University’s lobbyists will say anything to get their way. I heard them tell Legislators they had community consent. I am from the community and tell you what, they have nothing of the sort.” — Kukauakahi Ching, Native Hawaiian Practitioner.

Our sacred summits — Mauna Kea and Haleakala — are protected by law as conservation districts. These are public trust ceded lands–Hawaiian lands–held by the state in trust for the people of Hawaii. Yet, today Mauna Kea’s public lands are exploited by foreign corporations and the University, who are profiting from telescope activities on the summit at the public’s expense.

“The rent from the foreign telescope-owners is 30 years past due–they have paid only $1 a year to misuse Mauna Kea. If the state had been collecting the $50 million dollars a year from these foreign telescope-owners, like we suggested to them years ago, we would not have these budget shortfalls now. Remember, $50 million in 1 year is $100 million in just 2 years. They owe the people of Hawaii for 30 years of back rent. How dare they suggest to short-change the taxpayers now.” –Kealoha Pisciotta, President Mauna Kea Anaina Hou.

Forty years of uncontrolled telescope construction has desecrated cultural sites, contaminated the ground above the primary aquifer, and destroyed 90% of the endemic Wekiu’s habitat. Today, developers are vying to build two new telescopes (along with roads, parking lots, office buildings, and gift shops) on undeveloped habitat around the summit area. One of them — owned by the California Thirty Meter Telescope Corporation — is larger than all the current telescopes combined and will bulldoze the last pristine peak near the summit.

The only thing stopping them is the law. That is why the University is working hard to overturn the laws that currently protect our sacred summits and limit telescope construction. Two courts of law and two state audits have already found that the telescope industry violated the state and federal laws meant to protect Mauna Kea. The only way their future telescope construction plans can go forward is for the University and the telescope developers to change and exempt themselves from these protective environmental laws.

This latest bid to take over Mauna Kea has two fronts:

1. Pressure the Land Board to adopt an illegitimate management plan that limits public access, dictates religious ceremony, and allows UH and telescope developers to pocket public money,

2. Lobby the Legislature to pass one of four bills that will hand-over authority for managing Mauna Kea to the primary developer of the summit, the University of Hawaii.

All of it comes down to the University’s same, long-sought goal: make it easier to exploit Mauna Kea for money. The latest proposal on the table would allow the University to restrict public access (including how and when Hawaiians may worship at the sacred summit), pocket all the money made on Mauna Kea, and exempt themselves from public oversight. This is a public policy and legal nightmare!

“The University wants to gate the road to Mauna Kea–the road was paid for by taxpayers, it’s a public road. The University wants to require Hawaiians to get a permit to worship–Mauna Kea belongs to Ke Akua, they cannot lock the people out of the temple. Even if Hawaiians could get a permit, it would mean they couldn’t bring their non-Hawaiian friends and ohana to ceremony. This is discrimination! Who is the University to say who can and cannot worship?” — Paul Neves, Alii Ai Moku, Royal Order of Kamehameha I.

Your voice can help preserve the sacred temple and delicate ecosystem of Mauna Kea. Take action now to tell the Legislature and the Land Board that Mauna Kea is still not for sale.

Mahalo nui,
Us Guys at KAHEA: The Hawaiian-Environmental Alliance

1149 Bethel St., #415
Honolulu, HI 96813
www.kahea.org
blog.kahea.org

local ph/fx: 808-524-8220
toll-free ph/fx: 877-585-2432
email: kahea-alliance@hawaii.rr.com

Mauna Kea plan blasted

The University of Hawai’i (UH) has overdeveloped Mauna Kea in violation of previous management plans and Kanaka Maoli religious beliefs.  Now it seeks to build the Pan-STARRS, an Air Force telescope, and a giant Thirty Meter Telescope.  Furthermore, UH is seeking to become the managing entity for Mauna Kea, which would be the proverbial fox guarding the henhouse.

The Hawaii Tribune Herald reported on recent  hearings.  Here’s an excerpt:

“The state may not give the university something the university is not authorized to do,” said Kealoha Pisciotta, president of Mauna Kea Anaina Hou, one of the plaintiffs in the outrigger telescope case. She struck out at a proposal to manage public access to the mountain.

“Mauna Kea is a temple. It’s created by Akua for the people,” Pisciotta said. “The university may not close the doors to the temple. You are not in control. We are not in control. Akua is in control. And quite frankly, I am totally opposed to that. How dare you. Would you close the doors to a church? No. You may not do that to Mauna Kea either. And who does the university think they are to make people go to classes? The public is not the problem on Mauna Kea. Overdevelopment is, and you are the developer (a reference to the university).”

The article also quotes Moanikeala Akaka:

“Mauna Kea belongs to the people of Hawaii,” said Moanikeala Akaka, a former Office of Hawaiian Affairs trustee. “It does not belong to UH or Ku’iwalu to use, abuse or control.”

“As the court has ruled, there has already been negligence, environmentally and culturally, on the summit of Mauna Kea,” she said.

 OpenCUNY » login | join | terms | activity 

 Supported by the CUNY Doctoral Students Council.  

OpenCUNY.ORGLike @OpenCUNYLike OpenCUNY

false