Army studying effects of dumping of chemical and conventional munitions at sea

Army is studying effects of dumping live ammo in sea

By Gregg K. Kakesako

POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Aug 04, 2009

For the past two years, the Army has reviewed more than 2 million documents under a congressional mandate to pinpoint and determine the effects of dumping of chemical and conventional weapons into the ocean — which was banned in 1972.

To date, the Pentagon has spent $7 million to determine the location of these munition dumpsites in Hawaii, analyze the effects on the environment and determine ways to remove the unexploded ordnance.

Tad Davis, the Army’s deputy assistant secretary for the environment, safety and occupational health, is in town this week to meet with Army officials, University of Hawaii scientists involved in several of the ocean monitoring and testing programs and members of the staffs of Hawaii’s congressional delegation.

He also will attend a special session of the Nanakuli and Waianae neighborhood boards tomorrow night to discuss the ongoing environmental issues at Makua Military Reservation, where the Army hopes to resume limited live-fire exercises at the end of this month.

Besides Hawaii, there were chemical weapons sea disposal sites in the Atlantic Ocean, the Gulf of Mexico and off Alaska.

Off Oahu there were three areas where chemical weapons were thrown overboard — two off Pearl Harbor. One is 10 miles south of Pearl Harbor where the ocean depth is 10,000 feet; another is five miles south of Pearl Harbor at a depth of 1,000 to 1,500 feet. The third is believed to be 10 miles west of Waianae where the depth is 10,000 feet.

About 2,000 conventional munitions — weapons that are not nuclear, chemical or biological — were dumped in the shallow waters off Waianae known as Ordnance Reef.

The Army Corps of Engineers hopes to begin clearing the reef and the ocean bottom of conventional munitions at Ordnance Reef, using robotic techniques beginning next summer. The Pentagon’s goal is to clear the water from the shoreline to 120 feet of unexploded munitions.

Davis said the Army will conduct another series of tests sampling the water, sediment, fish and limu living in the Ordnance Reef area later this month and in September. This is part of an ongoing study — the first done in May 2006, followed by another one last winter.

Davis said the Army, the university and other scientists are still studying the data and video obtained earlier this year by two UH deep-diving submersibles which scoured the ocean bottom at 1,500 feet, five miles south of Pearl Harbor.

The Army believes 16,000 M47-A2 bombs, containing 598 tons of mustard gas, were dumped there in 1944.

The Army says that between 1932 and 1944 chemical weapons such as blister agents lewisite and mustard gas and blood agents hydrogen cyanide and cyanogen chloride were disposed in the area.

There are no current plans to remove these canisters.

Davis said the deep-water survey “gave us a better understanding of disposal techniques.”

It was believed before the survey was started that the chemical weapons were thrown overboard at one site. However, Davis said “the (disposal) vessel was moving on a certain course and disposing of the munitions since they were found in a line on the ocean floor.”

Ocean dumping of munitions and other materials is illegal without a permit from the Environmental Protection Agency, according to the 1972 Ocean Dumping Act. The United States signed an international treaty in 1975 prohibiting ocean disposal of chemical weapons.

Source: http://www.starbulletin.com/news/20090804_Army_is_studying_effects_of_dumping_live_ammo_in_sea.html

NOAA monitors munitions dumped off Wai'anae

NOAA to track munitions in sea

Monitors at weapons dumpsites will check environmental effects

By Gregg K. Kakesako

POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Jul 22, 2009

Nine ocean current monitoring sensors will be placed off Pokai Bay at two World War II weapons dumpsites Friday as part of the Pentagon’s continuing assessment of the potential effects of sea-disposed munitions.

Tony Reyer, a scientist with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, said yesterday that four sensors will be located at the conventional weapons dumpsite a few miles off Waianae known as ordnance reef. Two will be placed in 300 feet of water, and another two at 50 feet.

Five others will be anchored with 3,000-pound weights in 8,000 feet of water at a deep-sea chemical weapons munition disposal site 10 miles west of Pokai Bay. A string of sensors will be linked at depths of 40, 492 and 1,476 feet.

Kekaula Hudson, project manager for the Army Corps of Engineers, said the Army hopes to begin recovering some of the conventional weapons dumped at ordnance reef as early as next summer using underwater robots.

“The plan is to use a barge system,” Hudson said, “and to treat the munitions on the barge and then take the scrap metal out of the state for disposal.”

All of the sensors will be battery operated and will be in place for a year.

The sensors will record speed and direction of ocean currents to determine where they would carry munitions materials if they were ever released.

“These sensors will collect data that has not been previously available and will give us a better understanding of the ocean conditions in the area,” said Jason Rolfe, co-leader of the $1.6 million NOAA project.

The current data also will be used in other projects, Reyer added, such as coastal zone management, pollution control, tourism and search and rescue operations.

Sensors will be deployed from the 68-foot NOAA research ship Hi’ialakai, commanded by Cmdr. John Caskey, and the UH research vessel Klaus Wyrtki.

Sixty years ago, the military dumped munitions off the coast of Waianae and now the NOAA is launching a study to learn more about the potential impacts from those sites.

Reyer, who was involved in NOAA’s 2006 sampling of sediment, water and fish at ordnance reef, said the dumpsites have not caused any health problems. No explosives or related compounds were detected in the fish samples taken during the two-week survey. Most munitions are covered with coral growth.

No similar tests were done at the deep-water dumpsite, Reyer said.

Hudson said a follow-up screening at ordnance reef will take place next month.

Tad Davis, the Army’s deputy assistant secretary for the environment, safety and occupational health, said the Army will spend $3 million to remove or destroy in place up to 1,500 conventional munitions using remote underwater drones and other robotic techniques perfected by oil companies.

The weapons range from .50-caliber or smaller ammunition to 50- to 100-pound bombs and 105 mm projectiles. Many of the munitions have been in the water so long that they have been become part of the reef.

The Army’s goal is to clear the water from the shoreline to 120 feet offshore.

Source: http://www.starbulletin.com/news/20090722_NOAA_to_track_munitions_in_sea.html

Undersea bombs threaten marine life

updated 1:16 p.m. EST, Thu February 26, 2009

Undersea bombs threaten marine life

By Azadeh Ansari

CNN

(CNN) — Beyond the golden beaches and beneath the blue waters of the Puerto Rican island of Vieques is a site that resembles more of a munitions graveyard than a Caribbean paradise.

Hundreds of corroding and unexploded bombs litter the sea floor, leaking toxins and taking a toll on nearby marine life. The munitions were left by the U.S. Navy, which had a training site on Vieques for six decades.

“We know that these munitions are leaking cancer-causing materials and endangering sea life,” said marine ecologist James Porter, associate dean of the Odum School of Ecology at the University of Georgia, who recently completed a research trip to Vieques.

Responding to a request by the governor’s office of Puerto Rico, Porter tested the island’s waters for the presence of radioactive material surrounding the sunken USS Killen, a World War II-era destroyer used as target practice for Navy missiles.

Instead, Porter stumbled upon another finding: cancer.

He discovered that feather duster worms, sea urchins and various types of coral found near bombs and bomb fragments contained high levels of carcinogenic material — in some cases 100,000 times more than what is considered safe for commercially edible seafood.
Don’t Miss

* Fish migrating to cooler waters, study says
* In Depth: Planet in Peril

“We have not yet traced these contaminants from the reef to the dinner table, but we definitely know these contaminants are in the marine ecosystem,” he said.

Porter was scheduled to present his findings Thursday at the Second International Dialogue on Underwater Munitions in Honolulu, Hawaii. The conference brings together scientists, military officials and underwater technology companies to discuss how to identify and clean up hazardous undersea munitions dumps from the Caribbean to the Baltic Sea.

“Any country that has a coastline and has ever had war is going to be a place where you can find this problem,” said Porter, who warns that removing underwater munitions takes careful planning. “If you pick up a bomb, you pick up a problem.”

Vieques, which lies just east of Puerto Rico’s mainland, has had a long history of U.S. military involvement. The Navy used the island as its main Atlantic training site for 60 years before pulling out in 2003.

In 2005, the Environmental Protection Agency designated portions of Vieques Island a Superfund site, classified under a federal program to clean up the nation’s hazardous waste.

The U.S. Navy has allocated an estimated $350 million in recent years to clean up areas of Vieques where unexploded bombs could come into contact with residents or tourists, said Christopher Penny, head of the U.S Navy’s Vieques Restoration Project. But these efforts so far have been limited to the land and shoreline.

Vieques is one of many ocean sites around the world affected by abandoned ordnances, said scientists and military officials.

“In the U.S. and countries around the world going back to World War II, it was common practice to … take munitions to a site well offshore and dispose of [them],” said Addison Davis, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army for Environment, Safety and Occupational Health.

That changed in 1982, when the United Nations passed the Law of the Sea Treaty, which made it illegal for countries to dump excess weapons in open waters.

But cleaning up after history has its own unique challenges.

One of the many political and environmental obstacles to addressing this issue is the lack of a munitions “map.” There is no national or international registry that can pinpoint where these dump sites are, Porter said.

Many of the bombs also have been corroded by saltwater over decades, making it more difficult for restoration crews to identify and safely remove them. Toxic elements such as TNT, mustard gas and the chemical weapon Lewisite also can be hard to detect in large bodies of water.

“It is a combination of looking at the safety, health and environmental risks and establishing levels for the cleanup,” said the Army’s Davis.

One highlight of this week’s conference in Honolulu is the Army’s plan to remove old explosive rounds dumped in the shallow waters of Pokai Bay off Oahu’s Wai’anae Coast, an area known as Ordnance Reef. The Army has allocated about $4 million to clean up the area, which is estimated to hold more than 2,000 explosives.

“What we’re going to attempt to do is look at those munitions in the water that have the greatest potential for harm for people and the environment and to go after those first,” said Davis.

Conventional and chemical weapons have historically been detonated or left to corrode, which presents a challenge when cleaning up ordnances from the sea floor.

But a retired Navy bomb-disposal technician has invented a remotely operated vehicle he says can find, collect and dispose of these munitions in a safe way.

James Barton calls his prototype an Ordinance Removal System. The machine picks up unexploded bombs off the sea floor and delivers them to a lift basket for surface disposal or deep-sea burial. It is operated remotely with toggle switches and relies on an underwater hydraulic system designed by Barton, president of Underwater Ordnance Recovery Inc.

“I built this technology to help this problem, because people want these munitions out of the water,” Barton said.

Scientists and military officials hope Porter’s findings and Barton’s device will help bring attention to an environmental problem that for years has been out of sight, out of mind.

“The environmental cost, preparation and training for war has huge environmental impacts that normally are not considered,” Porter said. “We normally think of this kind of defense as national security. But in the long term we live on one planet, and taking care of that is maybe our best self-preservation and self-defense.”

Vieques underwater ordnance leaking carcinogenic toxins

The study cited below looked at contamination from deteriorating underwater munitions in the sea around Vieques, Puerto Rico.  There are also thousands of tons of unexploded munitions, including chemical weapons, in the waters surrounding Hawai’i.  James Porter, the researcher from the University of Georgia, will be presenting his findings at an international conference on underwater munitions being held in Honolulu in February.  Here’s the link to the conference website: http://underwatermunitions.com/index.php

Old ordnance under the sea may be toxic – study

By CHRIS LAMBIE Staff Reporter

January 17, 2009

Unexploded munitions lying under the sea leak cancer-causing toxins, a new study shows.

The research, to be presented at a conference in Hawaii next month, looked at a naval gunnery and bombing range off Puerto Rico where many munitions failed to explode. But James Porter, the ecologist who conducted the study on reefs at the eastern end of Isla de Vieques, said he would expect to find the same results anywhere in the world that bombs and bullets have been dumped into the sea, including Nova Scotia.

“The problem that we have studied looks at the unexploded ordnance, which then lie on the sea floor, corrode and leak these toxic materials into the ocean,” Mr. Porter said Friday in a telephone interview from his office at the University of Georgia.

“It’s not a problem that’s isolated in one country. I would think every nation that has a coastline would have this problem.”

This province has more than its fair share of unexploded ordnance in its waters, said Terry Long, a Cape Breton man who is organizing next month’s Second International Dialogue on Underwater Munitions.

“There’s more than 3,000 munitions sites off the coast of Nova Scotia,” said Mr. Long, a former military engineer who now works on ordnance and munitions disposal.

“There are approximately 45 shipwrecks in Halifax Harbour, of which 35 contain munitions. The Bedford Basin is full of munitions from the 1945 (Bedford) Magazine explosion.”

Representatives of the Department of National Defence are slated to attend the Feb. 25-27 conference in Honolulu.

But a DND spokeswoman said she was unable to provide answers Friday to questions about dangers posed by unexploded ordnance in Canadian waters.

One of the most common toxins found in the Puerto Rico study was trinitrotoluene, commonly known as TNT.

“There were, in fact, eight different cancer-causing chemicals that we found in high concentrations,” Mr. Porter said.

He found the substances had made their way into corals and sea urchins in high concentrations.

“One coral colony had 600 milligrams per kilogram TNT in the flesh of a living coral,” he said. “That’s horrifically high, and it exceeds the (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s) cancer-causing safety standards.”

Toxins were also found in more mobile sea life, including lobster and fish, but those levels were within acceptable health limits, Mr. Porter said.

“The next study that needs to be done would be by oncologists, who would try to find out whether the seafood, which does have these chemicals in them – that’s what we’ve shown – is being consumed in quantities that would explain the cancers (in the local human population),” he said.

Militaries, including Canada’s, clean up their ranges on land by removing unexploded ordnance.

“One of the things I would like to see is to have that common practice of range maintenance extended to include the shallow, near-shore environment,” Mr. Porter said. “There’s no reason why these things shouldn’t be picked up. We can do it; we have the technology to do this.”

His co-author, James Barton, has built a remote-control machine that lifts unexploded ordnance off the ocean floor, puts it in a basket and sends it to the surface for disposal.

“It looks sort of like an underwater backhoe,” Mr. Porter said.

Cleaning up unexploded munitions off this province’s coasts would create work and help counter the effects of the recession, Mr. Long said.

“We’ve got 3,000 sites off Nova Scotia but we don’t have any cleanups going, not one active cleanup,” he said.

“The time is right. Let’s put our people to work and clean up these sites.”

(clambie@herald.ca)

© 2008 The Halifax Herald Limited

Source:http://thechronicleherald.ca/NovaScotia/1101147.html

 OpenCUNY » login | join | terms | activity 

 Supported by the CUNY Doctoral Students Council.  

OpenCUNY.ORGLike @OpenCUNYLike OpenCUNY

false