Two Hawai'i-based USS Greeneville sailors held for brutal beating

Updated at 1:15 p.m., Friday, June 5, 2009

Hawaii sailor still held on high bail in N.H. attack

Associated Press

PORTSMOUTH, N.H. – Two nuclear submarine sailors, including one assigned to help crewmates stay out of trouble, continue to be held on high bail, accused of brutally beating a man and leaving him near death on a Portsmouth, N.H., street.

One of the accused crew members of the USS Greeneville was on duty and driving a Navy “safe-ride” van, a shuttle service that picks up sailors, including those who might have had too much to drink while off duty.

In court Thursday, Seamen Gerald Smith of Hawaii and Sandy Portobanco of Inglewood, Ca., did not contest that police had probable cause to arrest them in last month’s beating of Stephen Huntress, a former town councilor in bordering Kittery, Maine.

Huntress still is hospitalized.

The sailors are being held on $200,000 bail.

Source: http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20090605/BREAKING01/90605043/Hawaii+sailor+still+held+on+high+bail+in+N.H.+attack

USS Stennis port visit to Pearl Harbor

Updated at 3:44 p.m., Thursday, May 28, 2009

USS Stennis arrives at Pearl Harbor

Advertiser Staff

The aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis arrived at Pearl Harbor this morning for a port visit after a four-month deployment to the Western Pacific.
Advertisement

The Stennis, with nearly 5,000 crew and air wing members, is based out of Bremerton, Wash.

Stennis left Bremerton on Jan. 13 for what was supposed to be an approximately six-month tour. It picked up Carrier Air Wing 9 during a stop in San Diego.

The regularly scheduled deployment is part of the Navy’s Fleet Response Plan, which is designed to allow the Navy to rapidly respond on short notice.

A sailor on the Stennis died April 24 while the carrier was moored at Changi Pier in Singapore when he was crushed between a small boat and the ship’s hull, the Navy said.

The sailor was conducting a routine procedure to secure drains from the ship’s catapult system at the time, officials said. Stennis had arrived in Singapore on the same day.

The Navy also relieved of duty the ship’s executive officer five days later in an action that was unrelated to the death of the sailor, the Associated Press said.

AP said Cmdr. David L. Burnham was relieved of duty by the commander of the carrier strike group for undisclosed personal misconduct.

Source: http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20090528/BREAKING01/305280008?GID=LpZUTk6tqzsmGQcSGjeexzekk/BgBsOtI3S0f+p3wtc%3D

Pearl Harbor sailors arrested for beating in New Hampshire

2 in crew of Pearl sub held in N.H.

By Star-Bulletin Staff and News Services

POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, May 24, 2009

Authorities in New Hampshire arrested and charged two crew members of a Pearl Harbor-based nuclear submarine with beating a man unconscious and threatening a witness on a Portsmouth, N.H., street.

The victim, a 48-year-old man, was found badly beaten shortly before midnight. He remained in critical condition yesterday at Portsmouth Regional Hospital with a broken skull.

Gerald Smith, 22, and Sandy Portobanco, 23, assigned to the USS Greenville, were charged with first-degree assault and witness tampering. They were being held at the Rockingham County Jail on $200,000 bail.

The USS Greenville is at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard for extended maintenance, a Navy spokesman said.

Portsmouth police said Smith was driving a government van when he took offense to a comment the victim made. Smith and Portobanco confronted the victim and beat him, police said. They also allegedly threatened a witness before fleeing the scene.

Source: http://www.starbulletin.com/news/20090524_2_in_crew_of_Pearl_sub_held_in_NH.html

Missile Defense group wants DoD to deploy Sea-Based X-Band Radar

20090401_nws_xband1

Photo: Honolulu Star Bulletin

Use X-Band for launch by N. Korea, group urges

By Gregg K. Kakesako

Apr 01, 2009

A missile defense advocacy group wants the Pentagon to deploy from Pearl Harbor the anti-ballistic missile tracking system known as Sea-Based X-Band Radar to monitor the planned North Korean rocket launch.

However, there has been no official word on what the Pentagon plans to do.

The Pearl Harbor-based destroyer USS Chafee, armed with the sophisticated Aegis radar and missile weapon systems, has been ordered to be part of the flotilla of warships that will monitor the North Korean launch planned between Saturday and April 11. The Chafee initially was in South Korea with six other U.S. warships as part of 12-day joint defense exercises in early March.

The Aegis combat system can simultaneously detect, track and destroy a multitude of targets. But the X-Band radar platform has more powerful sensors, capable of discriminating rocket stages and payload, including a possible dummy warhead.

North Korea has said it intends to launch a satellite, but a 2006 U.N. Security Council resolution bars the rogue state from experimenting with space-launch technology.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates has said there are no plans to shoot it down.

“I think if we had an aberrant missile, one that was headed for Hawaii, that looked like it was headed for Hawaii or something like that, we might consider it,” Gates said this week on “Fox News Sunday.”

Two weeks ago, Adm. Timothy Keating, commander of U.S. forces in the Pacific, said in an interview with ABC News that the U.S. military was “fully prepared” to shoot down the missile if ordered to do so.

In a letter to Gates earlier this week, Riki Ellison, chairman of the Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance, urged the Pentagon to “consider activating all available missile defense assets to the Pacific to protect against an errant space launch attempt or a ballistic missile launch that threatens the United States or our allies.”

On its Web site, the nonprofit alliance, which supports a missile defense shield for the U.S., noted that an ideal orbital launch from North Korea, using optimal rotation of the Earth, would take the booster over Japan and east over the Pacific.

The group noted that the $950 million SBX, perched on a semi-submersible oil rig, is “the most powerful and most capable sensor” to track the launch.

“If deployed, the SBX can begin to emit its sensor 50 or so miles from Hawaii and can become effective by providing sensoring information to the deployed long-range missile defense system in place today,” the group said.

The rig was diverted from tests in 2006 to track a North Korean Taepodong-2 that failed shortly after launch.

The 280-foot radar platform has been a frequent visitor to Pearl Harbor, arriving in February for maintenance work.

A missile defense advocacy group wants the Pentagon to deploy from Pearl Harbor the anti-ballistic missile tracking system known as Sea-Based X-Band Radar to monitor the planned North Korean rocket launch.

However, there has been no official word on what the Pentagon plans to do.

The Pearl Harbor-based destroyer USS Chafee, armed with the sophisticated Aegis radar and missile weapon systems, has been ordered to be part of the flotilla of warships that will monitor the North Korean launch planned between Saturday and April 11. The Chafee initially was in South Korea with six other U.S. warships as part of 12-day joint defense exercises in early March.

The Aegis combat system can simultaneously detect, track and destroy a multitude of targets. But the X-Band radar platform has more powerful sensors, capable of discriminating rocket stages and payload, including a possible dummy warhead.

North Korea has said it intends to launch a satellite, but a 2006 U.N. Security Council resolution bars the rogue state from experimenting with space-launch technology.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates has said there are no plans to shoot it down.

“I think if we had an aberrant missile, one that was headed for Hawaii, that looked like it was headed for Hawaii or something like that, we might consider it,” Gates said this week on “Fox News Sunday.”

Two weeks ago, Adm. Timothy Keating, commander of U.S. forces in the Pacific, said in an interview with ABC News that the U.S. military was “fully prepared” to shoot down the missile if ordered to do so.

In a letter to Gates earlier this week, Riki Ellison, chairman of the Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance, urged the Pentagon to “consider activating all available missile defense assets to the Pacific to protect against an errant space launch attempt or a ballistic missile launch that threatens the United States or our allies.”

On its Web site, the nonprofit alliance, which supports a missile defense shield for the U.S., noted that an ideal orbital launch from North Korea, using optimal rotation of the Earth, would take the booster over Japan and east over the Pacific.

The group noted that the $950 million SBX, perched on a semi-submersible oil rig, is “the most powerful and most capable sensor” to track the launch.

“If deployed, the SBX can begin to emit its sensor 50 or so miles from Hawaii and can become effective by providing sensoring information to the deployed long-range missile defense system in place today,” the group said.

The rig was diverted from tests in 2006 to track a North Korean Taepodong-2 that failed shortly after launch.

The 280-foot radar platform has been a frequent visitor to Pearl Harbor, arriving in February for maintenance work.

Source: http://www.starbulletin.com/news/20090401_use_xband_for_launch_by_n_korea_group_urges.html

New Missile Defense Command

http://www.navytimes.com/news/2009/03/navy_bmd_command_030409/

Navy Times
March 5, 2009

CNO announces new missile defense command

By Andrew Scutro

Next month the Navy will establish a new command with missile defense in mind.

Adm. Gary Roughead, chief of naval operations, announced the coming formation of the Navy Air and Missile Defense Command during a speech before a business group Wednesday night in Northern Virginia.

“We’ll formally stand it up in April, but it will be the place where the Navy comes to bring together the thinking, the ideas, the concept, the intellectual effort for our air and ballistic missile initiatives, efforts and programs so that we can stay in the forefront of this important mission area,” Roughead told the group.

He said it will be based in Dahlgren, Va. – where the Navy has an existing facility – though further details about the new command were not readily available Wednesday night.

Tensions over ballistic missile launches have risen in recent weeks because of news that North Korea was preparing a test launch. The saber-rattling was taken seriously enough to prompt a comment from Adm. Timothy Keating, head of U.S. Pacific Command, who was quoted saying, “If a missile leaves the launch pad, we’ll be prepared to respond upon direction of the president.”

The Navy has had several successful ship-launched intercepts of test ballistic missiles. As of November, Navy shot 19 interceptor missiles at speeding targets and was successful in 16 attempts.

The Nov. 1 test was the first “fleet operational firing.” After two target missiles were fired from the Pacific Missile Range Facility on Kauai, Hawaii, an SM-3 fired from the destroyer Paul Hamilton directly hit the first. Another ship, the destroyer Hopper, failed to intercept the second target missile.

The Missile Defense Agency, which oversees the military’s BMD programs, has also been testing land-based interceptor systems.

The Navy’s Aegis BMD program is directed by Rear Adm. Brad Hicks.

By upgrading existing Aegis radar systems and training ship crews to intercept airborne ballistic missiles, the Navy has been bolstering the usefulness of its older Flight I/II Burke-class destroyers, as well as some of its Ticonderoga-class cruisers.

There are six BMD-capable ships homeported in Pearl Harbor: the cruiser Lake Erie and destroyers Russell, Paul Hamilton, O’Kane and Hopper. The BMD-capable cruiser Port Royal ran aground Feb. 5, suffering extensive damage that will cost millions to repair.

Five are based out of Yokosuka, Japan: the cruiser Shiloh and destroyers John S. McCain, Stethem, Fitzgerald and Curtis Wilbur. Homeported in San Diego are the destroyers Decatur, Milius, Benfold, Higgins and John Paul Jones. Destroyers Stout and Ramage are the two Norfolk-based BMD-capable warships.

Roughead spoke at a meeting of the Fredericksburg Regional Chamber of Commerce Military Affairs Council. Also scheduled to speak was Rep. Robert Wittman, R-Va., following the showing of a film on ballistic missile defense.

Stranded Navy ship severely damaged coral reef

The two Navy photos below show the damage to the USS Port Royal. In the first photo, the sonar dome is ripped open and scrapes mar the new high tech anti-fouling blue paint.  The bottom photo shows where propeller blades were sheared off.

In the following photograph by Floyd Morris for the Honolulu Star Bulletin, you can see how close the stranded ship was to recreational and subsistence fishing areas.  The Navy now admits to having dumped 7000 gallons, not 5000 gallons as previously reported, of raw sewage without notifying public health officials.

www.starbulletin.com

Extensive coral reef damage revealed in ship’s grounding

The Navy had previously said that the site consisted only of sand and rocks

By Gregg K. Kakesako

POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Feb 20, 2009

State and Navy divers have determined that the $1 billion warship USS Port Royal damaged a coral reef when it ran aground half a mile south of the Honolulu Airport’s reef runway earlier this month.

“Although initial reports indicated that the ship had grounded on a rock and sand bottom, our subsequent surveys have shown that there is in fact coral reef,” said Department of Land and Natural Resources Director Laura Thielen in a joint news release with the Navy. “Divers from our Division of Aquatic Resources are now working in cooperation with counterparts from the Navy to ensure that no further damage occurs, and to map the full extent of the grounding scar.”

The Navy also faces the possibility of hefty fines since coral is protected by state and federal laws. Deborah Ward, DLNR spokeswoman, said it is “premature” to talk about fines until the joint state-Navy investigation is completed and reviewed by state attorneys. Last year, DLNR fined a Maui tour boat company $550,000 for damaging coral in the waters of Molokini islet.

In addition, the Navy says now that 7,000 – not 5,000 – gallons of waste water were dumped while the ship was aground Feb. 5-9 to prevent it from backing up and endangering the crew.

State and Navy divers will spend another week moving debris from the grounding area to deeper water and reattaching large pieces of coral.

The Navy had originally failed to tell the state and public about the waste-water discharge, even though two Health Department officials attended a meeting with Navy officials at Pearl Harbor on Feb. 8.

The Navy said the waste water consisted mostly of sea water, used to flush waste.

“Keep in mind that while the ship was aground for those 78 hours, the Navy was concerned foremost about the safety of the crew, freeing the ship and minimizing damage to the environment,” said Rear Adm. Joseph Walsh, deputy commander of the Pacific Fleet. “We regret this unintentional grounding, and we are glad that we were able to refloat the ship without injury to the crew while minimizing environmental harm.”

The dumping took place on Feb. 6 after a Navy barge was unable to transfer the waste water and fuel from the 9,600-ton guided-missile cruiser because of rough seas. The Navy said the Port Royal’s crew made every effort to mitigate the effects, including shutting off water to showers and sinks to minimize the released amounts.

The Port Royal was taken to Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard’s dry dock on Wednesday for repairs. When the grounding occurred, the vessel had begun sea trials after spending six months in the shipyard undergoing $18 million of repairs, maintenance work and repainting.

Although there has been no official damage report or estimate on the cost to repair the cruiser, Walsh has said that water leaked into the sonar dome located below the bow. Also, several of the 10 propeller blades were sheared off.

Photos released by the Navy show scrapes along the hull and at least five blades missing.

Initially, the Navy insisted the area where the ship ran aground in 20 feet of water consisted mainly of rocks and sand.

State and Navy divers from Pearl Harbor’s Mobile Diving and Salvage Unit 1 have been in the water since Feb. 12, tagging and replacing broken coral blocks.

The divers concentrated this week on mapping and photographing the extent of the damage to identify coral colonies that might be reattached to the reef using quick-setting cement.

Thielen said the department developed undersea survey and mapping techniques from two groundings in 2005: the Cape Flattery at Barbers Point and the Casitas at Pearl and Hermes reef in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands.

Navy and state divers also are noting the locations of detached reef blocks or other debris that might roll in the surf and cause additional damage to the reef over time.

These are being removed by Navy divers and disposed of at a deep-water site approved by the state.

The removed rocks range from 2 to 5 feet in diameter.

The Navy has not decided the fate of Capt. John Carroll, Port Royal’s commander, or any of the sailors who were on watch on the ship’s bridge at the time of the grounding.

Grounded Navy ship damaged Hawaii coral reef

HonoluluAdvertiser.com

February 20, 2009

Grounded Navy ship damaged Hawaii coral reef

DLNR can seek fines for harm caused by warship’s grounding

By William Cole
Advertiser Military Writer

The state for the first time yesterday confirmed there was significant damage to coral reef caused by the 3 1/2-day grounding of the guided missile cruiser USS Port Royal this month off Honolulu Airport’s reef runway.

The Navy, meanwhile, released photos of the 9,600-ton warship in drydock showing damage to its propellers, sonar dome and scrape marks on a hull that just months ago had been repainted a bright blue.

The ship ran aground Feb. 5 half a mile off the reef runway, and was freed Feb. 9.

Divers noted detached coral reef colonies, which are being tagged for possible reattachment using quick-setting cement, the state and Navy said in a joint release yesterday.

Some blocks of reef up to 5 feet in diameter that could roll in the surf and cause more damage are being removed by Navy divers and disposed of in deep water.

The largest blocks are being cemented in place to stabilize them and prevent further movement, according to the release.

“Although initial reports indicated that the ship had grounded on a rock and sand bottom, our subsequent surveys have shown that there is, in fact, coral reef,” said Laura H. Thielen, chairwoman of the state Department of Land and Natural Resources.

State divers “are now working in cooperation with counterparts from the Navy to ensure that no further damage occurs, and to map the full extent of the grounding scar,” Thielen said in the release.

The state divers have been in the water since Feb. 12, conducting an underwater survey of the grounding site. DLNR spokeswoman Deborah Ward yesterday said she couldn’t provide an estimate of the size of the coral reef area damaged.

Robert Harris, director of the Sierra Club Hawai’i Chapter, said the concern is that some coral species take decades, if not centuries, to grow back fully.

“We have a fair amount of reef around the island, but the corals have been under increasing stress due to increasing temperature of the water and other manmade effects,” Harris said. “So there’s been increasing concern about what’s going to happen to reefs.”

The DLNR can seek fines for coral damage; in January 2008 the department fined a Maui tour boat company $550,000 for damaging coral in the waters of Molokini Islet. It was unclear yesterday whether fines would be pursued against the Navy.

Crew kept safe

Rear Adm. Joseph A. Walsh, deputy commander of U.S. Pacific Fleet, said in the release that the Navy regrets the grounding, but is glad the ship was able to be refloated without injury to the crew.

“Keep in mind that while the ship was aground for those 78 hours, the Navy was concerned foremost about the safety of the crew, freeing the ship and minimizing damage to the environment,” Walsh said.

There was no oil leakage. Walsh said at a press conference following the grounding that the marine environment “has been described to me as a sand rock bottom … but it has the potential to sustain life is how it was described to me.”

The 567-foot Port Royal ran aground about 8:30 p.m. on Feb. 5 on its first day of sea trials after being in a Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard drydock for about three months for $18 million in maintenance.

The Navy was unsuccessful in three attempts to pull the $1 billion warship off the reef in 17 to 22 feet of water, and its very public predicament just half a mile off the reef runway garnered the Navy a lot of unwanted public attention.

After removing 600 tons of weight – including 500 tons of seawater ballast and 40 tons’ worth of anchors and anchor chains – the Navy lightened the ship enough to pull it backward from its perch around 2:40 a.m. on Feb. 9.

The incident heavily damaged the bow-mounted sonar housing and struts, shafts and propellers. Propeller blades were sheared off. The salvage ship Salvor, the Motor Vessel Dove and seven Navy and commercial tugboats were used to pull the Port Royal free.

The ship’s commander, Capt. John Carroll, was temporarily relieved of his duties, pending the investigation outcome. The extent of repairs that are needed and bill for the work are still being determined, the Navy said.

As many as 42 sailors a day from the Navy’s Mobile Diving and Salvage Unit One have been assisting the state effort, moving and reattaching large pieces of coral.

The Navy yesterday said 7,000 gallons of wastewater were released by Port Royal while it was aground to prevent the sewage from backing up into the ship. The state Health Department previously complained the Navy did not officially notify it of the release, which the state agency initially believed was 5,000 gallons.

Capt. W. Scott Gureck, a spokesman for U.S. Pacific Fleet, said there was a miscommunication during a time of hectic activity.

“This (the grounding) was an emergency situation where people could have died,” he said. “The focus was on keeping people alive and keeping a ship from breaking up and causing incredible environmental harm.”

Stuck Navy ship dumped 5000 gallons of raw sewage, but didn't report it

The USS Port Royal failed to disclose to State regulators that it dumped 5000 gallons of untreated sewage into the waters off the Honolulu Airport.   Many people fish, swim and paddle canoes in those very waters.   Yummmm…  The Honolulu Advertiser article captured the absurdity of the incident:

The omission was one more bit of embarrassment heaped onto the 3 1/2-day spectacle of a 9,600-ton warship capable of shooting down ballistic missiles in space sitting helplessly aground in 17 to 22 feet of water just off Honolulu International Airport’s reef runway.

Here’s the full article:

Stuck Navy ship failed to report sewage release near Hawaii shore

5,000 gallons of raw wastewater went into sea during Port Royal grounding

By William Cole
Advertiser Military Writer

The Navy is pointing to a breakdown in communication in failing to report to state officials a 5,000-gallon release of raw sewage Saturday night by the grounded cruiser Port Royal, which was refloated early Monday.

The state Department of Health revealed the information yesterday. The Navy had not mentioned the sewage release at news conferences discussing the incident.

“The Navy did its best to keep all the responding organizations informed amid rapidly changing circumstances,” said Capt. W. Scott Gureck, a spokesman for U.S. Pacific Fleet. “Any breakdown in communication under these circumstances was unintentional.”

The omission was one more bit of embarrassment heaped onto the 3 1/2-day spectacle of a 9,600-ton warship capable of shooting down ballistic missiles in space sitting helplessly aground in 17 to 22 feet of water just off Honolulu International Airport’s reef runway.

The Navy said it recovered one of two bow anchors and chains yesterday, dropped by the Port Royal to help free its bow from the rocky and sandy bottom.

Officials said the centerline and starboard anchors and their chains weigh 40 tons. Subject to weather conditions, the Navy said it plans to retrieve the remaining anchor and chain today using the salvage vessel Salvor.

The Clean Water Branch of the state Department of Health said it was notified on Monday by the state Office of Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response of the raw sewage discharge between late evening Saturday and 10 a.m. Sunday.

The 567-foot Pearl Harbor cruiser ran aground about 8:30 p.m. Thursday a half-mile from shore.

“No official notification (of the sewage discharge) was given to the Department of Health, even though two DOH staff persons attended a meeting at 2 p.m. Feb. 8, 2009 in Building 150 (at the) Pearl Harbor Naval Base,” the Health Department said in a release.

The Health Department said it confirmed the sewage release yesterday morning.

Gureck said had the Navy not discharged the wastewater, it would have backed up onto the ship. About 130 of the 324 sailors had been off-loaded by the time the ship was refloated, officials said.

“The reason (the sewage) was released was to protect the health and welfare of the crew,” Gureck said, adding the release was done at ebb tide to carry it away from recreational waters.

Officials said Navy ships can store about a day’s wastewater, which is released when a ship is at sea.

There remained questions about the Health Department’s jurisdiction regarding a Navy vessel, but Health Department spokeswoman Janice Okubo said the Navy should have notified the state.

The release of 1,000 gallons or more sewage by a permit holder is considered a significant amount, and the public is required to be notified, Okubo said.

The Health Department also said it was notified Monday of the bypass of 12,700 gallons of treated but not ultravioletly disinfected effluent from the Navy’s Fort Kamehameha wastewater treatment plant. The release occurred near the Pearl Harbor channel.

In response, the Health Department is advising the public to stay out of waters fronting the reef runway from Ke’ehi Channel to the Pearl Harbor channel.

A meeting of state and federal agencies, including the state Department of Land and Natural Resources, the Navy, Fish and Wildlife Service and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, was held yesterday to plan for an investigation of the impact of the grounding on the marine environment.

The Port Royal is expected to head to drydock by the end of the week for repairs.

Nuclear future for Hawai'i? 'A'ole!

The Honolulu Advertiser editorialized that perhaps Hawai’i should reconsider its ban on nuclear power since the Navy continues to violate Hawai’i’s constitution by bringing nuclear powered ships and nuclear weapons into our waters and ports.   Crazy.

We almost had a nuclear catastrophe in port when a fire aboard the USS Sargo nearly caused a meltdown of the reactor. The captain had to sink the ship to flood it in order to extinguish the fire.

Leaking nuclear cooling water has led to radioactive Cobalt 60 contamination in the sediment of Ke Awalau o Pu’uloa (aka Pearl Harbor).

Spent fuel is cut out of the nuclear ships and stored on the docks in the shipyard behind concrete barricades until they can ship it out to a “permanent” disposal site.  Problem is, there are no safe and permanent methods of disposing of nuclear waste.

No, Hawai’i should strengthen it’s nuclear ban, and make the Navy adhere to it.

Hawaii’s nuclear future

January 9th, 2009 by Jerry Burris

The latest word is that the Navy intends to homeport a number of the latest class of nuclear submarines at Pearl Harbor. Military reporter William Cole has the story HERE.

That’s good news for the economy, workers at Pearl Harbor Shipyard and and for folks who sell things to the submariners and their families. Part of the work of the Shipyard will be involved with nuclear reactor “refueling and defuelings,” according to Cole.

This raises an interesting question as the state moves toward an energy future that is less dependent on oil. Today, the state constitution forbids the use of nuclear power without extraordinary approval by the Legislature (section 8). Might this change the argument?

After all, we are already putting nuclear fuel in and taking nuclear fuel out within the borders of our state. Should this option be reserved for the military alone?

A thought, at any rate.

Source: http://akamaipolitics.honadvblogs.com/2009/01/09/hawaiis-nuclear-future/

Hawai'i to become hub for new nuclear submarines

January 9, 2009

Hawaii’s Pearl Harbor to become hub for new nuclear subs

Virginia-class vessels likely to mean hiring hundreds more workers

By William Cole
Advertiser Military Writer

Two-thirds of the Navy’s new Virginia-class submarines initially will be based at Pearl Harbor, making Hawai’i the main hub for the advanced attack submarines, Navy officials said yesterday.

The Navy plans to build 30 of the nuclear submarines, which cost up to $2.5 billion apiece, carry torpedoes and missiles, and can drop off commandos close to shore.

The Navy isn’t releasing the exact number or arrival schedule for subs coming to Pearl Harbor beyond the USS Hawaii, expected in late June, and the USS Texas, scheduled to arrive in late October or early November.

U.S. Sen. Daniel K. Inouye, D-Hawai’i, previously has said the USS North Carolina also will be homeported here.

The Navy revealed the Virginia-class submarine distribution information yesterday at an annual military update for the Hawai’i business community.

Capt. W. Scott Gureck, a spokesman for the U.S. Pacific Fleet, said Virginia-class submarines initially will be homeported in Groton, Conn., and at Pearl Harbor. At least four that are in active service have operated temporarily out of the East Coast.

The 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review, a 20-year planning roadmap for the military, called for 60 percent of attack submarines to be based in the Pacific and 40 percent in the Atlantic.

“The initial (Virginia-class) homeporting will indeed be at Groton and Pearl Harbor, but eventually they will be everywhere we currently have Los Angeles-class (subs),” Gureck said. “It’s just from a parts standpoint and maintenance standpoint, you don’t want to put a couple Virginias in all the locations. You want to put them where you have critical mass.”

The overall number of attack submarines at Pearl Harbor – about 15 – will not change, Gureck said. The new Virginia class will replace existing Los Angeles-class submarines as the older class reaches the end of its lifespan, he said.

The Virginia-class arrival is good news for Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard, the state’s largest industrial employer, with 4,200 civilian workers.

About 90 percent of the yard’s work has been on the aging Los Angeles-class attack submarines, including maintenance as well as nuclear reactor refueling and defuelings.

More Shipyard jobs

Capt. Gregory Thomas, who commands the shipyard, yesterday said the switch to Virginia-class work “keeps us focused on what’s been our principal product here for the past 10 years – which is submarines.”

“It’s a very smooth transition,” Thomas said, adding that the workload should mean an increase to about 4,400 shipyard workers by 2013. The bulk of the work was non-reactor servicing, and that will continue with the Virginia subs, he said.

Northrop Grumman is producing the Virginia-class submarines in a teaming arrangement with General Dynamics Electric Boat. The Virginia class is ultimately expected to total 30 vessels.

Ten of the vessels have been delivered or were already under contract before a December award of a $14 billion contract for eight more of the submarines, according to Bloomberg News.

The contract calls for construction of one submarine in each of the years 2009 and 2010, and two per year from 2011 to 2013.

The submarines are 377 feet long and have a beam of 34 feet. They can operate at underwater speeds of more than 25 knots, dive more than 800 feet and stay submerged for up to three months at a time.

The submarines also are equipped with a lock-out chamber large enough for nine commandos, more than triple the capacity of older submarines.

Military and economy

About 270 business people attended yesterday’s military update at the Hilton Hawaiian Village by all five of the U.S. armed forces, a larger turnout than usual for the annual meeting.

The event is hosted by the Chamber of Commerce of Hawai’i. Charlie Ota, the chamber’s vice president for military affairs, said the big turnout may be tied to business looking even more to the military for contracts in tough economic times.

The military “is a relatively stable source of revenue to the economy,” Ota said.

The military, the No. 2 contributor to the state’s economy behind tourism, has been in expansion mode in Hawai’i in recent years.

Lt. Gen. Benjamin R. Mixon, commander of U.S. Army Pacific at Fort Shafter, said 10,500 soldiers and civilian workers have been added in Hawai’i.

Col. Wayne Shanks, a spokesman at the command, said that change has taken place since the late 1990s. Shanks said Schofield Barracks has about 20,000 soldiers and Fort Shafter has about 3,000.

Adm. Robert Willard, the four-star commander of the U.S. Pacific Fleet and the keynote speaker at the chamber’s luncheon following the military update, said Asia and the Pacific will remain central to U.S. interests.

He said he doesn’t expect the commitment of operating forces to diminish, even with the current economy.

U.S. Pacific Command, headquartered at Camp Smith, covers half the globe and monitors five of the biggest militaries in the world: those of the People’s Republic of China, India, Russia, North Korea and South Korea.

“There are certainly concerns that the budgets in the military will be affected by the current economic environment that we find ourselves in,” Willard said.

But he added that he believes “the readiness monies that are invested in maintaining the fleet – and the forces that exist out here – will remain.”

Source: http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20090109/NEWS01/901090361

 OpenCUNY » login | join | terms | activity 

 Supported by the CUNY Doctoral Students Council.  

OpenCUNY.ORGLike @OpenCUNYLike OpenCUNY

false